Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: No Blue States
And the subsequent paragraphs under it state:

However, Carson Mark, former chief of nuclear-weapons design at Los Alamos, estimated that Iraq could have built a nuclear bomb using about 12.3 kilograms of HEU, or half the official SQ.12 Thomas Cochran, senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), stated that "a low-technology bomb in the 10- to 20-kiloton range would require about 10 kilograms of highly enriched uranium."13

A research team at the University of California (Santa Cruz) found that three kilograms, in fact, would be sufficient to produce a nuclear bomb. By means of computer modeling of a simple fission weapon design, they found a nuclear yield equivalent to more than 100 tons of high explosives could be achieved with only one kilogram of HEU and "a yield half that of the Hiroshima bomb" with five kilograms.14 The authors concluded that "one can make an atomic weapon with much less nuclear material than generally thought," and they proposed "that the use of HEU should be eliminated in applications in order to prevent the spread of small-scale atomic weapons."15

30 posted on 12/23/2003 6:21:45 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Cultural Jihad
>>>.....would require about 10 kilograms of highly enriched uranium<<

That tracks with a technical article I read quite a while ago which put it at "about 22 lbs".

38 posted on 12/23/2003 6:28:41 PM PST by HardStarboard (Dump Wesley Clark.....he worries me as much as Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Cultural Jihad
Wow. I hope everyone reads that.
39 posted on 12/23/2003 6:28:54 PM PST by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson