Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
Uh, in the link you posted, under the definition of "breach of confidentiality" it mentioned the release to a third party of someone's medical information "without a patient's consent or a court order." Seems to me "court order" would be pretty applicable here.

Look, what's going on here is everybody is busting a gut and shooting all the messengers and blindly defending Rush because they can't see this in any other context except the war between left and right in this country, plus you also have the libertarians coming out of the woodwork again railing about privacy rights.

I'm not going to be naive and deny that folks on the other side are laughing and having a field day at this. But at it's heart this is a matter of criminal law that transcends political matters. And all of you look me in the eye, as best you can through cyberspace, and deny before God and everyone that if the situation was reversed and this were Hillary Clinton, you wouldn't be screaming "BURN THE WITCH!" But of course, that would be the OTHER side getting its big ox gored, so it would be OK.

As far as right to privacy, has that ever really existed? As an example, a relative of mine just got out of the military after 20 years, won't say which branch except that his job description was "intelligence chemist" and he made a couple of trips to Iraq following Gulf War I as part of an investigative delegation. He once told me not to type one syllable onto my computer keyboard and send it out into cyberspace unless I was unafraid for it to be read by somebody else. He wasn't smiling and he's not the kind of guy to lie about something like that.

In other words, Big Brother is watching us all right now at this very moment.

137 posted on 12/23/2003 9:52:25 AM PST by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: GB
Florida has a constitution privacy clause:

****
SECTION 23. Right of privacy.--Every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into the person's private life except as otherwise provided herein. This section shall not be construed to limit the public's right of access to public records and meetings as provided by law.

History.--Added, C.S. for H.J.R. 387, 1980; adopted 1980; Am. proposed by Constitution Revision Commission, Revision No. 13, 1998, filed with the Secretary of State May 5, 1998; adopted 1998.

***

It has been most used regarding medical records, access to abortion rights.

It will be interesting what the 4th DCA in FL comes up with.
155 posted on 12/23/2003 10:26:04 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson