Skip to comments.
US Republicans signal readiness to resume Iraq weapons probe
AFP/Yahoo ^
| 12/22/03
| Unknown
Posted on 12/23/2003 6:10:07 AM PST by JohnGalt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
With news that
David Kay has given up his search for WMDs to spend more time with his children, the WMD Dead Enders will have to find a new champion.
If the Republican Senators dig deep enough, they can aid Jim Baker and the Bush-Rove efforts to get the neocons out of this administration.
1
posted on
12/23/2003 6:10:08 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnGalt
If the Republican Senators dig deep enough, they can aid Jim Baker and the Bush-Rove efforts to get the neocons out of this administration.
huh?
3
posted on
12/23/2003 6:16:36 AM PST
by
adam_az
To: JohnGalt
But General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expressed confidence the weapons of mass destruction will be eventually found the same way US troops caught up with deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein -- through cooperation of Iraqi individuals. 'Nuff said.
4
posted on
12/23/2003 6:17:01 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: JohnGalt
Now, striking a conciliatory posture, Roberts said he had been working with the ranking committee Democrat, Senator John Rockefeller, and other members to defuse the standoff. "conciliatory" is not the word I would use to describe the posture used for pandering to Rockefeller and the other traitors
5
posted on
12/23/2003 6:19:45 AM PST
by
putupon
("Borders? We don' need no steenkin' borders!"-Presidente Jorge Dubya del Rino Arbusto)
To: putupon
"He did not repeat previous Republican demands that Democrats disavow their strategy paper, identify its author and present a formal apology for allegedly trying to manipulate the probe. "
ARGH!!!!!
6
posted on
12/23/2003 6:24:23 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
Pat Roberts is a marshmellow.
7
posted on
12/23/2003 6:27:06 AM PST
by
Luke21
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: adam_az
9
posted on
12/23/2003 6:31:24 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("Nothing happened on 9/11 to make the federal government more competent.")
To: seamole
10
posted on
12/23/2003 6:32:39 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("Nothing happened on 9/11 to make the federal government more competent.")
To: Coop
Ahh, Meyers is the New Champ then for the WMDeadenders.
Best to you, Coop, a true keeper of the faith.
11
posted on
12/23/2003 6:33:37 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("Nothing happened on 9/11 to make the federal government more competent.")
To: JohnGalt
You consider CBS an authoratative source?
Wait till the SOTU, JG. Patience is a virtue.
12
posted on
12/23/2003 6:35:05 AM PST
by
mewzilla
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnGalt
Best to you, Coop, a true keeper of the faith. He says, maintaining a death grip on his straw.
14
posted on
12/23/2003 6:40:47 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: mewzilla
15
posted on
12/23/2003 6:42:26 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("Nothing happened on 9/11 to make the federal government more competent.")
To: seamole
Saddam would still be ... acquiring nuclear weaponsNow there's a Christmas fantasy wish. Maybe you should check the news sometime: there was no nuclear weapons program in Iraq.
To: seamole
Please, you are a Wolfowitz guy not a Bush guy. I appreciate the abstraction of changing the subject from WMDs to winning this abstract war of yours, but try to stay on topic.
And you are the one who will have to pick a side, not me.
"If you had had your way, Saddam would still be at large, terrorizing the world and acquiring nuclear weapons."
What are you a Bostonian? Us 508 and 413 simply don't fear the cave dwellers like the urban Wilsonians I guess.
17
posted on
12/23/2003 6:47:40 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("Nothing happened on 9/11 to make the federal government more competent.")
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: putupon
Roberts is a boob. A first class boob, and he has served for most of his life as a political hack. Intelligence and Roberts are two words that do not jibe, and the man should resign as Chair and take up something else that would be less damaging to the Republic.
19
posted on
12/23/2003 6:48:22 AM PST
by
gaspar
To: Luke21
Pat Roberts is a marshmellow.Unfortunately what he looks like is a partisan hack. It is his responsibility to ferret out the facts and decide amongst the following choices:
1. There were no WMDs for several years but the president was misled by his neo-con advisors.
2. There were no WMDs for several years and the president knew that and lied about it.
3. There were in fact WMDs that are still hidden.
I think that we can eliminate choice 3 right now. It is critically important to determine whether choice 1 or 2 is accurate, even if it hurts GWB. If the Republican party in the person of Pat Roberts keeps protecting him, the party will go down in ashes with Bush. It is much better to openly reveal the truth and save the party. The difference is a choice between a Democratic nincompoop president plus a Democratic congress or just a Democratic president gridlocked by a Republican congress.
20
posted on
12/23/2003 6:54:04 AM PST
by
Mike4Freedom
(Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson