To: My Favorite Headache
Ashcroft was called back in from his vacation in Missouri and Rumsfeld from NM.Look at the LA Times thread ...The LA Times ... now there's a unbiased reliable source. Terror attacks, at least ones that are supposedly to be as well co-ordinated and devastating as threatened are highly unlikely. Granted, they may get one such attack off at some point ... but I don't think their infrastructure is sophisticated enough to pull off a double or triple hit. Most of these threats are along the line of Saddam's "mother of all wars" BS.
63 posted on
12/23/2003 2:44:58 AM PST by
BluH2o
To: BluH2o
I don't think their infrastructure is sophisticated enough to pull off a double or triple hit
Neither do I.
65 posted on
12/23/2003 2:54:16 AM PST by
pt17
To: BluH2o
"but I don't think their infrastructure is sophisticated enough to pull off a double or triple hit."
I'd like to believe you are right but we have to consider the possibility that their infrastructure has been beefed up with a direct purchase of WMD (as opposed to making them in their own labs) or that their infrastructure is being supported by a much larger one.
Socialists of a feather flock together especially those hued green and red at this time of year.
Think of the timing of our initial advance into battle and the advance of socialist agendas in Venuzuela and the SARs epidemic last year. China just had news of a new missle. And isn't it interesting that the breaking news is about a holstein with mad cow disease in the state of Washington( this has to be planted by the greens.)
140 posted on
12/23/2003 4:24:54 PM PST by
Domestic Church
(AMDG... perhaps we are already in WWIII)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson