Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
Another question for everyone on this thread.

Didn't the fact that Ascroft was sent for to get back from his vacation a real sobering fact in this article? It certainly was the key point in it for me.
118 posted on 12/22/2003 11:26:10 PM PST by My Favorite Headache (Rush 30th Anniversary Tour In May 2004...Be There)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: My Favorite Headache
It is certainly an strong indication of the seriousness and credibility of the threat.
122 posted on 12/22/2003 11:31:00 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
Is that a first, Ashcroft returning to DC?

How about other alerts, did he do that too?
133 posted on 12/22/2003 11:41:42 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
Can't we just conclude that Ashcroft's return is just a Code Orange scenario?
209 posted on 12/23/2003 6:06:52 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
Didn't the fact that Ascroft was sent for to get back from his vacation a real sobering fact in this article? It certainly was the key point in it for me.

Not really. In all likelihood certain threat levels automatically result in corresponding actions. The recall of officials critical to Homeland Security is no doubt one of those actions. Behaviors in response to a threat are generally driven by SOPs as opposed to a specific response to each scenario - that way actions are well-planned before the time of crisis, thus reducing the likelihood of making a series of poorly-reasoned decisions.

215 posted on 12/23/2003 6:18:06 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson