[Burkeman1]

You don't read them or listen to them? So you listen to the government now only? That is conservative? The gubmint tells the truth? GW is a decent man but he is no dictator. The many bureacracies he rules over have their own agendas and myriad byzantine political goals. To not watch or read even liberal dominated media and simply rely on the word of the administration you happen, at the time, to agree with is just not wise.

[Williams]

This entire article is contrived nonsense. Bush's relationship with the press is nothing like Vietnam or Wtaergate, unless it's the reporters who are delusional. None of the President's or anyone else's quotes in the article substantiate the strawman that they set up - an isolated Bush seething at the media. It just ain't happening that way.

[suzyq5558]

What i meant to say is that do not need to read the newspapers, i used to work for our local rag intill this past summer.what a crock of BS.
i come to the internet to get my news without the spin.
i get tired of the hostility don't you? wheres both sides of the issue? why is it that on the sunday shows they have five dems to one repub?
and i never did say that iam a blind follower of all guvmint all the time now did i?
I just dont need the print media to get the news nor do i need the alphabet channels.

[Cultural Jihad]

Whatsamatter? Afraid someone isn't going to read one of the irrelevant liberal media's anti-Bush screeds, and that makes you squeal?

[suzyq5558]

oh and one last point sir, i'am not solely relying on the word of this administration. but this administration is sure a heck of lot more forthright than that last creep who occupied the white house. i spend a good portion of my morning here not hanging onto all news bulletins from the boob tube or running out to buy a paper that is chock full lies.