Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS
You are wrong about the inner workings of Palm Beach or the FL courts. Rush made no violation of the financial transaction law. This was discussed in many threads.

I want far more information, if provable you could never seperate the drug dealers purchases from rush's personal use. Additionally, if I were prosecutor I would be wanting a serious explanation about the alleged blackmail.

If I were the maid's lawyer, I would be shutting my client up to the bare minimum of cooperation until the imunity is extened to the blackmail charge.

Newsflash, it has ALWAYS been more than we realize. THis fits with Rush saying that there is more here than he could talk about. There is the clinton lawyer shopping the story to the enquirer, there this the finaicial unit investigation in what should be a narcotics unit investigation. We are just trying to piece together as much information outside of the inadequacy of the media to give proper reporting.
63 posted on 12/22/2003 9:15:10 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
"Rush made no violation of the financial transaction law. This was discussed in many threads."

... and I suppose your ability to "piece together as much information outside of the inadequacy of the media to give proper reporting" extends to being able to say for a certainty that "Rush made no violation of the financial transaction law" ?

68 posted on 12/23/2003 6:16:54 AM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson