This is a local story. Dornan is looking for an issue to run on. He thinks it's drugs. Good luck.
I was more interested in addressing the broader issues brought up by the posters rather than, "Is the drug issue the right one for Bob Dornan?" Yawn.
Is that another way of saying "I'm only interested in making sure my kids never smoke pot."?
My personal interest is that during the recent recall election in California, Rohrabacher was held up as a good, conservative Republican by a lot of FReepers who, like me, were unaware of his personal stance on medical marijuana.
There are posters here on FR whom expressed opinions similar to Rohrabacher's and were chided by other FReepers and were accused of the very same things that Dornan and Wachter said about Rohrabacher in this article. Namely, that they were using medical marijuana as a stepping stone toward full legalization.
Others said that everyone who supported medical marijuana was shill for Hillary-pal, George Soros.
So, I'm curious if these very same FReepers will now say about Rohrabacher the things they said of those FReepers who've expressed support medicinal marijuana laws on FR.
I'd also like to know whether these FReepers also believe that Dana Rohrabacher is a shill for Hillary-pal, George Soros or if this argument was rhetoric spewed forth merely to win an argument.