[Qwinn]

I can't go with you on Nancy Reagan. Don't get me wrong, Nancy ROCKS in a thousand ways, but in terms of being attractive, I think Laura edges out.

However, you're right about Jackie Kennedy. She was definetly better looking and more attractive (to me as a guy anyway).

Of course, just like our -last- First Lady, her husband was running around on her in a big way. While it's wrong to hold her responsible for that, we -are- talking about them in the context of their role as "First Ladies", and in that sense one can certainly make the argument that while she may have been great looking, she probably wasn't really a "First Lady"... or a second... or a fifth... or a tenth... and as such it's a bit difficult to put her in the same category.

Qwinn

[usedtolurk]

I think that you have to put it into context. You have to compare Laura now to what Jackie looked like at 57.

[DollyCali]

Some Jackie links...

http://home2.planetinternet.be/verjans/Political_Divas/Jackie_Kennedy.htm

http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/firstladies/jk35.html

http://www.isdesigners.com/kenn/jackie.htm

OK, now we need some more photos of Laura at the 35-45 age bracket...