Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Safire: I Remember Muammar
The New York Times ^ | 12/22/03 | William Safire

Posted on 12/21/2003 7:40:15 PM PST by Pokey78

WASHINGTON — As American tanks began to roll through Iraq to overthrow Saddam, Libya's longtime terrorist, Muammar Qaddafi, came up with a strategy to avoid being next on the regime-change list: pre-emptive surrender.

Nobody calls it that, of course. Diplomats and doves want to treat the dictator's epiphany as the result of patient negotiation stretching back for decades. Some Republicans claim he was softened up by a bomb dropped his way in the Reagan years. But three years after that, his terrorists murdered 259 people aboard Pan Am 103.

Subsequent sanctions led to severe economic pain and the threat of a coup. After acknowledging Libyan responsibility, he has been trying to get U.S. oil companies back by promising to pay damages to the families of his victims.

That was not what caused this tyrant suddenly to confess to buying and developing chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, and to promise to reveal all to inspectors. He was transformed into a pussycat by the force of American arms in stopping the spread of mass-destruction weaponry.

Why did Qaddafi have his spy chief, Musa Kussa, approach Britain's Tony Blair — and not France, Germany or the milquetoast U.N, to get off George W. Bush's short list of rogue nations? The reason: Britain was America's primary ally in the war against Saddam and was the bridge to Washington. This shows that it pays to be the staunch friend of the U.S. in extending freedom and does not increase a nation's strategic importance to be America's political adversary.

France's Jacques Chirac and Germany's Gerhard Schröder may at last be taking this lesson to heart.

Only because American anti-terrorist resolve in Iraq was not lost on the ayatollahs of Iran, and because tens of millions of young Persians hunger for the democracy they can see in store for neighboring Arabs, were French and German diplomats able to elicit vague promises of W.M.D. restraint in Teheran.

And because unemployed French and German workers were angry at Chirac and Shröder when the Pentagon announced that no Iraqi reconstruction jobs would come their way from U.S. taxpayer funds, those erstwhile foot-draggers last week rushed to embrace Bush envoy James Baker. The awful prospect of missing out on a chunk of our huge investment in rebuilding Iraq made them eager to consider forgiving billions in odious loans they had happily extended to Saddam's tyranny.

Not all rogue nations have gotten the word. North Korea, the source of missiles to both Libya and Iraq, remains intransigent as China vainly tries to induce the U.S. to appease Pyongyang again. Syria, reported to be concealing billions of Saddam's money, claimed last week it shook $23 million out of Qaeda money smugglers, but won't let us interrogate them and wants to keep the proceeds in Syrian-occupied Lebanese banks.

On the whole, however, the post-9/11 Bush foreign policy — to remove the global threat of terror enabled by regimes opposing freedom — is succeeding. Events are proving that we and our coalition allies were right to root out the sources of terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. As the skin-saving démarche of Qaddafi demonstrates, introducing freedom to countries long denied it has a powerful effect on the actions of regional neighbors.

The euphoria of my fellow Wilsonian idealists, though understandable after this early winter of our discontent, is premature. Casualties will continue over there; Al Qaeda will likely attack us over here. Vladimir Putin, given a free pass by Bush and triumphant in Russian elections, will continue to ship nuclear fuel and scientific know-how to Iran, making it easier for those ayatollahs to break their promises to overly trusting Europeans.

I remember Colonel Qaddafi's underground poison-gas factory — "Auschwitz in the Sand" — and wonder where he bought Libya's present stock of centrifuges. As a Syracuse University dropout and trustee, I visit the memorial on campus to the 35 college students aboard Pan Am 103 whose blood can never be washed from his hands.

It may be, "for reasons of state" — like Musa Kussa's help in penetrating terrorist-protecting parts of Syrian and Saudi intelligence services — we should ultimately permit our investors to revive Libya's oil industry. But we should verify and never trust, and neither forget nor forgive Muammar Qaddafi.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: flight103; flt103; iran; justinraimondo; libya; lockerbie; next; panamflt103; qaddafi; raimondo; roguenations; safire; surrender; williamsafire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2003 7:40:15 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
What do these people have in common:

George Washington
Abraham Lincoln
Teddy Roosevelt
Thomas Jefferson
George W. Bush

?

2 posted on 12/21/2003 7:55:57 PM PST by Savage Beast (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
It's hard to figure out what to make of the Lybian news. Some agreements (like the N. Korean agreement during the Clinton years) are obvious shams -- they just make us look small and stupid for playing along. But other agreements to disarm are real. I like to think the Lybian agreement is real, but who's to say? It sounds like William Safire isn't sure himself.
3 posted on 12/21/2003 7:57:33 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
They all deserve to be on Mt. Rushmore?
4 posted on 12/21/2003 8:02:00 PM PST by aynrandfreak (If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
They are all Republicans?
5 posted on 12/21/2003 8:02:25 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
They were President of the United States?

What does Lincoln have in common with ANY of the others?

6 posted on 12/21/2003 8:02:36 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"I like to think the Lybian agreement is real, but who's to say? It sounds like William Safire isn't sure himself."

I am not in any way an apologist for quadaffi, but some of the thoughts that come to mind here are

1. Economically he stands to gain a LOT from this.
2. He apparently had a shipment of stuff busted recently, and that would have become a front-page issue otherwise. The current american administration isn't shy about exercting its reach, covertly or otherwise.
3. I have read about him surviving a recent coup? This could tie into #2.
4. People do change, though usually from serious health issues or death close to them. That could be at work here, he is not getting any younger.
7 posted on 12/21/2003 8:07:04 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
Lets see... most are in stone?? in maybe South Dakota??
8 posted on 12/21/2003 8:11:00 PM PST by stockpixx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Justin Raimondo
all were major warmongers

A beautiful thing.

11 posted on 12/21/2003 8:25:59 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Justin Raimondo
Just pokin' a stick, Justine.

Just pokin' a stick.

13 posted on 12/21/2003 8:34:53 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Pokey78
As I've said to others, I am deeply saddened that our nation is now negotiating with a terrorist who murdered over a hundred Americans. The only negotiation with Libya ought to be over the terms of Khaddafi's transport to the U.S. to face charges for Pan Am 107 and the Berlin Disco bombing.
15 posted on 12/21/2003 8:39:21 PM PST by fourhorsemen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: WoofDog123
I remember reading articles on FR about Khadaffi distancing himself from Arabs in favor of Africa. It seems to me that one of the primary reasons for a guy like him to oppose the US is to be respected as a great leader of Arabs, since their leaders define themselves by their ability to stand up to America and the Jews.

If he wants to be a great leader of Africa now, rather than of Arabs, the need to oppose America is not as strong, and the benefits of being a friend of America are great, at lease as far as removing sanctions and receiving economic aid.
18 posted on 12/21/2003 8:44:30 PM PST by EvilOverlord (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Justin Raimondo
Not a George Washington fan, eh? Would you have preferred King George III? Is any violence ever justifiable to you? ....(With the exception, of course, of the homicide bombings of your buddies the Palestinians).
19 posted on 12/21/2003 8:47:21 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Lookey here ......Justina was just nuked, perhaps permanently.
20 posted on 12/21/2003 8:49:54 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson