To: Sender
Sea born threat is real, but it's an obvious question, so it's no place to hide nukes.
They need defensive locations that are pinchpoints for attack but are also neutron micro-nukes....something like that. Something that looks like a desk or a xerox machine but is actually a package nuke.
86 posted on
12/20/2003 7:16:56 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
"Something that looks like a desk or a xerox machine but is actually a package nuke."Now cut that out! (grin)
You're talkin about the lost Ark of the Covenant!!!
93 posted on
12/20/2003 7:45:31 PM PST by
SierraWasp
(Any elected official or citizen that supports illegal aliens is nothing but a worthless scoff-law!!!)
To: xzins
"A Federation of American Scientists compilation, titled Soviet Weapons, notes that there is very little information in the public venue about the size and destructive power of the small weapons. The U.S. backpack nuke weighs 163 pounds and can be carried by one or two men. One Russian naval arms compilation talks about small portable nuclear weapons weighing from 59 pounds to 154 pounds."
http://www.humanunderground.com/archive/fbi-nukes.html From Washington Times 12/21/2001
To: xzins
They need defensive locations that are pinchpoints for attack but are also neutron micro-nukes....something like that. Something that looks like a desk or a xerox machine but is actually a package nuke. Interesting...sounds like a good idea.
143 posted on
12/21/2003 10:04:14 AM PST by
Sender
(“We have placed them in a quagmire from which they can never emerge except dead” -Baghdad Bob)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson