Skip to comments.
Saddam 'Actively Involved' In Directing Attacks On US Troops (New)
The Telegraph (UK) ^
| 12-21-2003
| Philip Sherwell
Posted on 12/20/2003 4:17:40 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: basque69
The Democraps have a vested interest in disaster. The DNC and al-Qaeda are natural allies.
21
posted on
12/20/2003 5:20:18 PM PST
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: blam
Can't be true. Dean said his capture didn't make America one bit safer.
To: cwboelter
Maybe it's my imagination...and wishful thinking, but it seems that since the capture of Saddam, not only do the attacks appear to be down, but US forces seem to be on the offensive. I'm just not hearing the daily barrage of bad news I've become accustomed to from the media. Am I missing these stories or is this the turning point. This is the turning point. With Saddam's capture, the game is now "turn in the other underground fighters and get rewarded, or wait to be turned in by the other guy and get thoroughly screwed"
23
posted on
12/20/2003 5:27:28 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(That which does not kill me, had better run away real fast)
To: blam
And the good news keepsonacoming!!!
To: BartMan1; Nailbiter
... ping
25
posted on
12/20/2003 6:22:21 PM PST
by
IncPen
( "Saddam is in our hearts! Saddam is in our hearts!" "Saddam is in our jail!")
To: AF68
But..but, on the Today Show, Qatie al-Qouric grit her teeth and told Lt. Gen. Sanchez that it was obvious that Saddam was in no position to be in command of anything. The farmhouse didn't even have a phone! Mark Shields also comfirms that Saddam was not directing any attacks...it must be true.
To: 07055
I believe that most FReepers were opposed to the Kosovo war. However, I can't remember any of us who wished that American solders/airman would die so that we could show that Clinton was wrong in getting us involved in that pointless war. Precisely. My take on it was that, like him or not, Clinton was the commander-in-chief, elected by due process. We were bound to support the war effort whether we agreed with it or not.
To: blam
It can't be true. Katie Couric said Saddam wasn't involved.
To: AF68
" Qatie al-Qouric "
ROTFLMAO!!!!
To: cwboelter
I'm just not hearing the daily barrage of bad news I've become accustomed to from the media. Am I missing these stories or is this the turning point.
^^^^
I guess the sounds of silence must signify a turning point. The 'bad news' reporters have had to report on how many servicemen have been injured since hostilies commenced in order to keep up their theme of 'President Bush is Bad." That must mean that there have not been any deaths for a few days - bad news for the anti-Bushes.
30
posted on
12/21/2003 6:28:54 AM PST
by
maica
(Laus Deo)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson