[faithincowboys]

I'm not denying his crimes-- I have said repeatedly that I wish he would be executed. I don't mitigate his crimes, I am sickened by them and think the trial has obscured his crimes.

My beef relates to Clark and the Euro-Leftists who are elevating him. Can you please acknowledge that Clark's present political philosophy and exploits in the Balkans eliminate him from being a useful witness against Slobo?

Answer this directly, had Clark's Iraq doctrine prevailed in the Balkans, would Slobodan be at the Hague?

If you answered my queries honestly, there is only one honest judgement. He should not have testified. He is a disgrace and a morally blind self promoter. I say "Death to Slobo and political Death to Clark." You should feel the same way!

Would you have had Joe Kennedy or Charles Lindbergh testify at Nuremberg?

[Hoplite]

Clark's present political philosophy and exploits do not have any bearing upon his testimony - they speak to his (lack of) suitability for the office of President, not to what transpired in the Balkans in the 1990's.

His testimony isn't about what he would have done in regards to Iraq, it was about what he actually did do and see, so his position on Iraq and all the pollster driven hypotheticals therein are immaterial to the evidence he gave at Milosevic's trial.

Look, I'm not the person you're looking for - you need to find someone with a "Clark 2004" bumper sticker and vent your spleen upon them - just do yourself a favor and make sure they're smaller than you.