Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XHogPilot; Hoplite; A. Pole
"Clark responds: pp 30521, line 14 - I don't accept the definition of the KLA as a terrorist organisation. I want to state that for the record."

What about you, Hoplite? Go on record-is the KLA a terrorist organization to you?

67 posted on 12/20/2003 9:57:25 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Destro
Gee Destro, if I did that, you'd be in danger of linking current President Bush with a terrorist organization, and get your silly little self booted off FR just like you did in regards to your comments regarding Bush the elder in your previous life.

Yes, the KLA utilized terrorism, which qualifies them for inclusion in the 'terrorist organization' category unless it can be proven that the leadership had nothing to do with those acts - yeah, right.

But they are less of a terrorist organization than Milosevic et al, which puts them in the same boat as Rashid Dostum and various other Afghan warlords who became allies of convenience in efforts to address larger problems and who are now being pressured into conforming to civilized norms.

72 posted on 12/21/2003 10:30:13 AM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson