[Hoplite]

Milosevic was allowed to address Clark's credibility by introducing General Shelton's comment on Clark's character, and by questioning him on the Mt. Igman incident.

Also, if the witness is a part of the conversation he is testifying about, the conversation isn't hearsay, at least not to my understanding of the matter.

[Destro]

Slobo sneaked that comment in and the court was in a panic-breaking its own rules and contacting Clinton during procedings to get Clinton's statement. Also-since when does there exist a one challenge to credibility rule in a court of law? If they allowed one such example why not another to back up the first?

[faithincowboys]

One would think that an admission about the "technical illegality" of the War right out of the horse's mouth would be germane to the proceedings. Clark knew it was illegal and continued on? Hmmm? I wonder if that's relevant.