[driftless]

Libs like Matthews have a typical tendency to argue backwards. They want things to be a certain way, so they try to bend reality to fit their warped theories. To wit the postulation that Bin Laden and Hussein could never join forces because they hated each other. Well we hated Stalin but we were staunch allies if only for the duration of WWII to defeat Hitler. Libs have to learn to deal with reality. Why wouldn't Hussein support Al-Qaeda? He supported many other strongly Islamist terrorist groups...why not Bin Laden's. Libs again just end up looking foolish as another of their pet theories gets blown out of the water.

[GWB00]

Libs like Matthews have a typical tendency to argue backwards

For some crazy reason I have been watching alot of Chris Matthews. I guess since they snatched Saddam, it is fun to watch these guys make fools with their ridiculous comments.

Matthews has his head so screwed on backwards. He plays so stupid about the real reasons why we went to war in Iraq. He acts like Ted Kennedy and pretends the war was made up in Texas.

If the Weekly Standard and other journalist can make these connections, you know Matthews you has to be aware of the same info. He is either purposely setting himself up to look like a fool, or he is hoping that he can convince enough of his viewers that there is no connection and when the connection is actually made, his viewers will be so conditioned that there isn't any connection that they won't believe it.

It is a game you play with children, but then again Matthews probably looks at his viewers like children.