Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Denies Redistricting Map Drawn to Harm Minority Blocs
Lubbock, TX, Avalanche-Journal ^ | 12-19-03 | AP

Posted on 12/19/2003 6:59:46 AM PST by Theodore R.

State denies redistricting map drawn to harm minority blocs

AUSTIN (AP) — Attorneys for the state defended a congressional district map in a federal courtroom Thursday, attempting to disprove plaintiffs' arguments that the new lines were drawn with racially discriminatory intent, violating the Voting Rights Act.

Attorney Andy Taylor questioned a map drawer about the intent with which each of the 32 districts was created by the Texas Legislature.

"I'm not aware of splits made to break up minority blocks," said Bill Davis, a former Republican state legislator and lobbyist who testified as the state began its case in the federal redistricting trial.

Democrats and some minority groups are challenging the map, saying it dilutes minority voting power. Taylor has contended from the start that the map was drawn merely to put more Republicans in Congress as a reflection of statewide voting trends.

Davis described how each county that was split, including Laredo in Webb County, was a result of lawmakers trying to balance population in each district. Each district is required to contain 651,619 residents, with no deviation, according to census figures.

Rep. Phil King, R-Weatherford, the lead map drawer for the House, said the map wasn't redrawn to hurt minorities. "Frankly, we did everything we could to make sure we had a map that passed legal muster," he said.

The trial moved into the final stretch Thursday, with closing arguments expected today.

The Justice Department still must deem the redistricting plan clear of Voting Rights Act violations before it can become effective.

State Rep. Ron Wilson, D-Houston, the lone black legislator to vote in favor of the redistricting plan, told the three-judge federal panel that he supported the plan because it contained a new Houston district in which a black candidate would likely win.

"I think it's worth my support of a plan that doubles the African-American representation from Houston in Congress," Wilson said.

Democrats have argued that the one new black district will come at the expense of seven other white Democratic representatives who traditionally vote in line with the interests of minorities in their districts. But Wilson criticized the white Democrats who garner the support of many minorities in their districts, as doing "lip service" to minority interests.

Democrats and some minorities want the state to maintain existing districts, which have given Democrats a 17-15 advantage in the Texas delegation.

Republicans contend they should have more members of their party in Congress because most Texans generally vote Republican. The GOP holds all the statewide elected offices and controls the Legislature.

The redistricting plan was passed in an October special session after partisan fighting all year and two out-of-state boycotts by Democrats.

Various groups of Democrats, the American GI Forum, the League of United Latin American Citizens and the Texas NAACP are challenging the plan.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andytaylor; billdavis; boycotts; democrats; justicedept; laredo; lulac; minorities; naacp; philking; redistricting; republicans; ronwilson; tx; votingrightsact; webbco

1 posted on 12/19/2003 6:59:47 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
This is a big one...If we win the court battle the House likely stays in GOP hands until at least 2012. I don't understand the RAT argument. How does it hurt minorities to create new districts that are designed for minorities to win them? I hope the GOP lawyers hammer that point home.
2 posted on 12/19/2003 7:05:04 AM PST by wylenetheconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Wilson, no doubt, will be running in the new Houston district?
3 posted on 12/19/2003 7:17:42 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: ken5050
Wilson, no doubt, will be running in the new Houston district?

He hasn't said so, and Chris Bell, a white first-term Congressman who is arguably the incumbent, will certainly seek to be elected from that district.

Bell will be re-elected unless he gets a primary challenge from Wilson or another serious black candidate.

5 posted on 12/19/2003 7:23:06 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Javelina
That's a given, f'sure..My original question was posed rhetorically..and if you're gonna have a Dem in the delegation, better to have a kook...Sheila Jackson Lee needs a new runnin' buddy......BTW, do you have any info on the time constraints of this whole process..
7 posted on 12/19/2003 7:25:29 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Sounds like Wilson's gonna run then...as the Dems become more marginalized, they start to cannabalize themselves...we saw the samwe thing in NYC, where Eliot Engel barely survived a primarl challenge from a Latino state senator...the demographics of Engel's distric have changed...even more fascinating, thake a look at the seniority list of the House Dem caucus, and note how many of them are in the Black Caucus...
8 posted on 12/19/2003 7:28:18 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
Javelina, are you following me around? lol. I understand that. The point I was trying to make with my question was that since the R's are creating new districts for minorities to get ELECTED in, not just vote RAT for a white guy, can't the GOP lawyer argue that the GOP plan is better for minorities? The only argument that the RATS have is that white Democrats are inherently better for minorities than white Republicans. I don't think that will fly unless it is a liberal judge.
9 posted on 12/19/2003 8:32:51 AM PST by wylenetheconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Minorities are the only people who still vote consistently RAT. I'm gonna love it when all these sniveling white liberals can't get elected anymore because they can't get the nomination of their own party due to the fact that they are white.
10 posted on 12/19/2003 8:34:22 AM PST by wylenetheconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
When is the decision on this supposed to come down?
11 posted on 12/19/2003 8:42:16 AM PST by hispanarepublicana (Mr. Fox, give us our water!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
I would think that the decision would have to be coming before Jan. 1, wouldn't you? Filing begins shortly after the first of the year.
12 posted on 12/19/2003 10:25:04 AM PST by Theodore R. (When will they ever learn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson