To: Dog
Wait now, I thought these guys were under Military arrest. If so, they'd be supplied with military lawyers, and subjected to Military judges and rules, right? Wondering....
19 posted on
12/18/2003 11:49:53 AM PST by
theDentist
(This Tagline for Rent. Contact theDentist for further details....)
To: theDentist
It's for the children.............
23 posted on
12/18/2003 11:50:58 AM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: theDentist
Wait now, I thought these guys were under Military arrest.
If we had stored them on non-United States land, Guantanamo is a US reservation, they would have had no rights. However, since they are on United states soil, and thanks to some liberal judge years ago, it was determined that people have certain inaliable (pardon the spelling) rights when they get on US soil. Just like illegal aliens making it to US soil and having rights. If they had been stored in, say, Turkey, the 9th circuit would not have had jurisdiction. I'm not happy about it, but this is their outlook.
Merry Christmas
To: theDentist
Wait now, I thought these guys were under Military arrest.
If we had stored them on non-United States land, Guantanamo is a US reservation, they would have had no rights. However, since they are on United states soil, and thanks to some liberal judge years ago, it was determined that people have certain inaliable (pardon the spelling) rights when they get on US soil. Just like illegal aliens making it to US soil and having rights. If they had been stored in, say, Turkey, the 9th circuit would not have had jurisdiction. I'm not happy about it, but this is their outlook.
Merry Christmas
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson