Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff
Well, that isn't correct - - most states don't now allow "civil unions."

Exactly what Bush said is that this is a state issue (marriage licenses are issued by the state, after all) unless they come down on the side of homosexual marriage, then he'll make it the FedGov's business to clarify the definition of a marriage. Sounds clear enough to me, unless you are one of those that thinks the FedGov ought to interfere in state's rights.

16 posted on 12/18/2003 9:33:37 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ravingnutter
unless they come down on the side of homosexual marriage

civil union is an attempt to create a "marriage" by another name. Bush is ducking the issue.

21 posted on 12/18/2003 9:59:48 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson