[jwalsh07]

The court cravenly did not answer the important question that was before it- how a court should determine whether a citizen is properly held as a renegade- instead it bizarrely pretended that miltary force does not include military detention

There may be 3 or 4 people on this thread who understand that.

[mrsmith]

It's truly a bizarre ruling.
Would overturn 200 years of constitutional interpretation if it held- which it won't.

[mrsmith]

"There may be 3 or 4 people on this thread who understand that. "

In fact I don't believe any of the Freepers who just might intelligently try to defend this ruling have shown up.
Maybe there'll be some good discussion tomorrow, but I don't think anyone will go for this.