To: rface
In a choice between Drudge and OReily ..... I'll stand by Drudge almost every time. Well, I'll cancel your vote.
Drudge's "scoops" continue to get more lame with time; the only thing his site is good for is to link to some other website.
I'm not a particularly big fan of O'Reilly, but Drudge is just a glorified webmaster.
18 posted on
12/18/2003 7:52:01 AM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: sinkspur
They're both from 1998.
53 posted on
12/18/2003 8:29:00 AM PST by
Taliesan
To: sinkspur
I'm not a particularly big fan of O'Reilly, but Drudge is just a glorified webmaster. Thinking on it I cannot remember the last time O'Reilly actually had a good show. He doesn't expose people and he rarely wins a point of view. Drudge at least brings the news that matters to millions.
109 posted on
12/18/2003 11:36:04 AM PST by
Naspino
(Exodus 22: 28 Thou shalt not revile the gods, nor curse the ruler of thy people.)
To: sinkspur
"Well, I'll cancel your vote."
Somehow that does not surprise me.
125 posted on
12/18/2003 2:59:47 PM PST by
Revel
To: sinkspur
I like the Drudge site for it's very simplistic and easy on the eyes format and links. I rarely read his own stuff however and place little value in it. I could care less why O'Reilly hates Drudge or Drudge hates O'Reilly. But O'Reilly is just over the top and all over the map. He is a phoney. Drudge? Eh. Still have some respect for him over the Monica story. But hardly think he is Uber Cyber Journalist that is going to bring down the establishment media that he makes himself out to be.
126 posted on
12/18/2003 3:15:57 PM PST by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson