Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jalisco555
As I recall wasn't the critism that "he was wrong" But they found no problems with his research methods or statistical analysis, just his conclusions were off.
5 posted on 12/18/2003 5:47:38 AM PST by Sinner6 (Any midwesterns want to buy a chinchilla? It's friendly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sinner6
Worse than that. Scientific American, which was the basis of the Danish charges against him, refused to allow Lomborg the opportunity to rebut their articles. They basically said "He's wrong because we say so."
6 posted on 12/18/2003 6:02:57 AM PST by jalisco555 (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson