Replies

There are zealots here who claim to be fighting the homosexual agenda. In doing so there is no right or benefit they would "allow" individual homosexuals. They paint them all with ths same brush. They have posted psuedoscience and will try to overwhelme you with "facts" if you disagree.

Their ping list is long, but they all sound like the same person. Many who disagree with them just ignore them, but some of us like to point out their fanaticism from time to time so that casual readers will know that freepers are not all extremists.

Just to let you know (Constantine), breakem for some reason can't tolerate those of us on FR (which includes the owner of this forum, BTW) who are opposed to the promotion of the homosexual agenda. There is a wealth of information about the dangers of same sex acts, the miseries attendent to it, the dangers to children raised by two people of the same sex acting as parents, the psychopathology of same sex attraction, and so on.

Breakem - you get mad and criticize scripter and others, but never have I seen you present any information supporting your support of the homosexual agenda. You call us fanatics and haters and so on, but you don't provide any factual rebuttals.

I and scripter and others here do not hate homosexuals. The opposite. I wish them to become happy people and I hope they stop trying to destroy the natural institution of the family, which will hasten the destruction of our civilization. As said very clearly today by Mike Savage. He pointed out that right after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, one of the first things the communists did was try to dismantle the institution of family - they wanted the children to be raised by the state. Same thing with Hitler - he wanted to destroy the authority of the parents, through Hitler Youth, pure Aryan breeding farms where the future Nazi homosexual militaristic elite would be conceived.

Michaelangelo Signorile - a noted spokesman for the "gay" intelligentsia, and a contributor to the NY Times, has written that the homosexuals really could care less about matrimony. He admits that their real desire to have same sex marriage is to destroy the meaning of marriage and family, to usher in a pan-sexual free for all, and in order to do this, children need to be influenced by homosexuals from an early age. Therefore natural mother/father family life has to be destroyed. This is his admitted reason, not my imagining.

There are zealots here who apparently cannot support their statements so they try to denigrate the facts and those who post facts. They also misrepresent the positions of those who disagree with them, incorrectly summarize the position of those who disagree with them, and then attack the straw man argument they've created.

The pseudoscience, as the zealots refer to the facts, are never refuted nor discredited with anything other than hot air. Many times we have asked for supporting evidence but it is never provided. I've personally stated I would stop posting whatever is demonstrated to be incorrect. If those who call the facts pseudoscience actually had supporting evidence, one would think it prudent to at least post a link but that never happens. So their complaints appear to be just more hot air.

Why just last night breakem got his clock cleaned again when he posted something he couldn't support and left with his tail between his legs. Unfortunately for him it's a common occurrence on the homosexual threads. Other than that he seems like a decent guy.