Amelia wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Do you support Harry W. Browne?
No, -- I support constitutional restoration, one of the stated goals of this site.
Those of you I pinged have a big bone about libertarianism that is simply unjustified by the RLC's position, posted here long ago by JR:
REPUBLICAN LIBERTY CAUCUS POSITION STATEMENT
Address:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-rlc/721810/posts 207 -tpaine-
Since I haven't come close to denigrating anyone but Harry W. Browne on this thread, I take it you agree with him? I've asked you about that once or twice already, and you've preferred insults to answers.
-amelia-
NO, -- [which means I do not support harry] -- I support constitutional restoration, one of the stated goals of this site.
Those of you I pinged have a big bone about libertarianism that is simply unjustified by the RLC's position, posted here long ago by JR:
REPUBLICAN LIBERTY CAUCUS POSITION STATEMENT
Address:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-rlc/721810/posts There is no 'insult' in stating the above, we just disagree on politics, and indeed, that concept is incomprehensible to some around here.
Instead of working for constitutional
restortation, -- they admit attacking their 'ankle biting' peers for sport. [see CWO's remarks]