Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarian Harry Browne: Bush Did Not Liberate Iraq
HarryBrowne.org ^ | Dec 15, 2003 | Harry Browne

Posted on 12/17/2003 8:04:12 PM PST by Commie Basher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-273 next last
To: Republican Wildcat
Now, now, don't go trying to change the context of the discussion.

Military adventurism is the context of the discussion. We're in this war now because American troops were sent to the other side of the globe to re-install a King to his throne.

I'll ask more directly: Do you agree with Browne's premise that Saddam Hussein should have remained in power?

Browne's premise isn't that Saddam should remain in power, but that the expense and unintended consequences of America removing him aren't worth it to Americans. With that I concur. I couldn't really care less about Saddam Hussien.

121 posted on 12/17/2003 9:57:16 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Yeah, American troops in the Middle East had nothing to do with it.....

Right you are, the American troop presence did force the Terrorists to work "underground" and it did deter outward attacks greatly.

Oh, excuse me! You expect us to believe that our troops presence is what actually caused the Arabic hate for the West?

Unless you are a TROLL and have been geting your "facts" from DU, you had better go back to school and finish your education!

122 posted on 12/17/2003 9:57:25 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Libertarians are LOOOOOOSERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Thanks for the reply. I now have all the information I need to gauge your credibility.
123 posted on 12/17/2003 10:04:28 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
Elect a libertarian. Then get blown up by an Islamist. Blow up real good. Where's your liberty then?

Libertarians wouldn't have put U.S. tax dollars and U.S. troops in the Middle East in the first place. Without involving the U.S. in other people's wars, my liberty is fine.

124 posted on 12/17/2003 10:05:27 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
I couldn't really care less about Saddam Hussein.

You just expressed an oxymoron, but we understand what you really meant....

As far as Saddam is concerned, perhaps a million or more Iraqui citizens, who he had executed simply because they did not agree with his political philosophy, would differ with your isolationist indifference.

Personally, being a veteran myself, I truely care about preventing this kind of injustice from occuring in the World. By doing so, I also make my home land a safer place to live in for both you and me!

125 posted on 12/17/2003 10:07:33 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Libertarians are LOOOOOOSERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
This is very sad. I went to see this guy speek and I am still registered a Libertarian to. I feel bad. :(

126 posted on 12/17/2003 10:11:26 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
Libertarians are worse than the French.
127 posted on 12/17/2003 10:14:41 PM PST by Drango ("To Serve Man" ... IT'S A COOKBOOK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
I always wondered about Harry Browne since he alluded in his book to walking out on his family.
128 posted on 12/17/2003 10:15:56 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Oh, excuse me! You expect us to believe that our troops presence is what actually caused the Arabic hate for the West?

No, it's just what caused OBL to 'declare war' on the U.S. and start a series of bombings killing Americans.

129 posted on 12/17/2003 10:17:42 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Libertarians are worse than the French.

LOL, I wish I had thought of that one.

130 posted on 12/17/2003 10:18:49 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Going to see someone speak is nothing...I went to see communist Vandana Shiva speak when she came to my school (for the entertainment value). She made claims such as corporations becoming more involved in agriculture led to the Oklahoma city bombing...it was rather amusing. Actually she made comments on the War on Terrorism quite similar to the philosphy stated by Mr. Browne.
131 posted on 12/17/2003 10:21:38 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
President Harry Browne. What a frightening thought.
132 posted on 12/17/2003 10:24:57 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
So, essentially, we should install a Taliban-style, radical islamist government to deter those attacks. That's not a very powerful argument for protecting liberty.
133 posted on 12/17/2003 10:25:51 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
How has Iraq been liberated? Let me count the ways . . .

In Harry Browne's list of 14 ways in which the U.S. is oppressing the Iraqis, I don't see anything about torture, beheadings, and systematic rapes.

As for gun control (which I am against)--there seemed to be an awful lot of Iraqis running around with guns on Sunday, shooting in the air.

134 posted on 12/17/2003 10:26:28 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I couldn't really care less about Saddam Hussein.

You just expressed an oxymoron, but we understand what you really meant....

Well, it's actually literally true. I could NOT care LESS about Saddam Hussien than I do. If I could care less, it would mean I cared at all, and I don't.

Personally, being a veteran myself, I truely care about preventing this kind of injustice from occuring in the World. By doing so, I also make my home land a safer place to live in for both you and me!

I have no problem with you joining any Abraham Lincoln Brigades you want and going forth to fight in other people's wars. When you want to do it on my dime, and thus put me and my family at risk of retaliation, I have a problem with it.

135 posted on 12/17/2003 10:28:17 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
So, essentially, we should install a Taliban-style, radical islamist government to deter those attacks. That's not a very powerful argument for protecting liberty.

The attacks didn't come until we put U.S. troops and U.S. tax dollars in the Middle East. Causality is time sensitive.

136 posted on 12/17/2003 10:32:30 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
The goal is to turn all nations into a radical Islamic state. Our having or not having troops in these areas doesn't change what we aren't. It's obvious you don't have a grasp of the full range of issues involved based on your comments.
137 posted on 12/17/2003 10:44:06 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
But no inquiring minds bothered to ask how everyday Iraqis could be carrying AK-47s out in the open, when the American occupiers have imposed strict gun-control edicts and are at war with resisters.

Not true. I've seen people openly carrying AK's. In some places the local rulers (mafia) run toll gates on the raodways. They let the military convoys through, of course, since a SAW or .50 cal trump an AK any day of the week. Got to admit I get a little puckered when I see guys walking on the road w/ AK's as I drive by. Bottom line is that Browne has sunk below pathetic in his need for some sort of attention.

138 posted on 12/17/2003 10:54:19 PM PST by Eagle Eye ( Saddam-Who's your Bagh-Daddy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Browne's premise isn't that Saddam should remain in power, but that the expense and unintended consequences of America removing him aren't worth it to Americans. With that I concur. I couldn't really care less about Saddam Hussien.

Libertarianism is the politics (religion) of apathy. A society that embraces apathy is a society that has no shame. It is dead, useless, reprobate, decayed.

In my opinion, each person (and society as a whole) has a destiny. Will we do our part to help the dike hold? Or walk away pretending the rising flood of terrorism is just someone else's problem. The Libertarian will cross the street to avoid tripping over the wounded soul to whom a good samaritan will end up helping.

IMO, the Libertarian philosophy is selfish, dispicable, and treacherously unprincipled. The Libertarian will cross the street to avoid tripping over the wounded soul to whom a good samaritan will end up helping.

139 posted on 12/17/2003 11:46:27 PM PST by cilbupeR_eerF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
This irrational rant by Browne makes me glad in that its increasingly clear that the Libertarian party, with this kind of knee-jerk anti-war position, will never siphon votes from the Republican party the way the Green party does from the Democrats.
140 posted on 12/18/2003 12:28:40 AM PST by jagrmeister (I'm not a conservative. I don't seek to conserve, I seek to reform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson