Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bommer
We had to rely on an informat to tell us where Saddam was. You think these idiots are going to be able to find Osama?

Heh. Yeah, never mind that "informants" are a regular source of information for any intelligence operation. Besides you're mixing apples and oranges here. The "prevention" of 9/11 and the apprehension of Saddam are not similar in scope, mission, or operation.

Whatever attack you're making upon the CINC, it ain't workin'.

388 posted on 12/18/2003 12:45:45 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
Heh. Yeah, never mind that "informants" are a regular source of information for any intelligence operation. Besides you're mixing apples and oranges here. The "prevention" of 9/11 and the apprehension of Saddam are not similar in scope, mission, or operation.

Oh really? Newsweek has a direct contact to Osama, Tenant does not. The CIA was looking for Saddam, but it was the 4th Infantry that found the informant that turned him in. The CIA knew of plans to fly airplanes into building as early as 1991, no precausions. Recent papers found connect Mohammed Ada (SIC) to training in Bagdad, yet the CIA will still not connect Salmon Pak to 9/11. Please tell me more about the CIA and George Tenents effectiveness?

427 posted on 12/18/2003 7:58:18 AM PST by Bommer (Democraps: The New Improved NAZI's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson