To: sinkspur
I don't think 9/11 could have been prevented, and NOBODY foresaw it. A similar multiple hijack and bombing plot, called project Bojinka, was averted a few years before 9/11. How can you say it was unforeseen when it was almost implemented?
126 posted on
12/17/2003 6:53:32 PM PST by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: eno_
A similar multiple hijack and bombing plot, called project Bojinka, was averted a few years before 9/11. How can you say it was unforeseen when it was almost implemented?And terrorists blew up the Cole, in 2000.
How were we to know that terrorists weren't focused on blowing up ships, instead of flying airplanes into buildings?
You're revising history.
Nobody knew, and there was no way for anybody TO know.
133 posted on
12/17/2003 7:05:34 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: eno_
"A similar multiple hijack and bombing plot, called project Bojinka, was averted a few years before 9/11. How can you say it was unforeseen when it was almost implemented?" It's called "Getting Lucky"
I'm confident that if there was actionable Intel of a specific attack planned for 9/11, action would have been taken to prevent it, We didn't even have enough Arabic Translators at the CIA to translate the intercepts we were getting. So even if conversations between Mohammed Atta and his fellow Jihadist were intercepted a week before 9/11, we wouldn't have translated them in time to prevent the attacks.
Fact is... We were caught of guard and we learned a very tough & costly lesson on 9/11
135 posted on
12/17/2003 7:06:20 PM PST by
MJY1288
(The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
To: eno_
Clinton's people testified that they believed a Bjoinka couldn't happen in the U.S. because there weren't many radical islamists in the US and the ones that were here were under FBI survelliance.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson