Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stop Legal Plunder
My preference, of course, is that they should be able to breed themselves into poverty all they wish, as long as nobody is sticking a gun in my face to make me pay for it.

I would hardly call limiting excessive procreation in circumstances where the family can't pay for it - 18 children! - totalitarian.

Just the fact of public schooling means they are on the dole - the legal plunder you want to stop - for around $6k/kid/year, so that's $124,000/year the taxpayer is paying (minus a miniscule amount of taxes collected from them, if any) versus the $10,000 one-time private charity they are receiving.

I don't see what's so conservative about this story.
18 posted on 12/17/2003 9:12:18 AM PST by thoughtomator (The Federal judiciary is a terrorist organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator
I would hardly call limiting excessive procreation in circumstances where the family can't pay for it - 18 children! - totalitarian.

It certainly is -- especially when the main reason fathers can't provide financially for their children is the plunder of the state. Adjusted for inflation, the current per child tax exemption is thousands of dollars below its original value. Fixing this alone would solve the problem for most families in America.

31 posted on 12/17/2003 9:40:34 AM PST by Stop Legal Plunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: thoughtomator
Just the fact of public schooling means they are on the dole - the legal plunder you want to stop - for around $6k/kid/year, so that's $124,000/year the taxpayer is paying (minus a miniscule amount of taxes collected from them, if any) versus the $10,000 one-time private charity they are receiving.

I have 25 cousins that are homeschooled (twelve in one family alone) using family funds exclusively (three other cousins are educated at private schools). Their parents are forced to pay for the state "public school" monopoly even though they receive no benefits from it. The same is true of childless couples and retirees that are forced to pay property taxes that are coerced "for the children".

It's not fair to criticize or punish one family for the injustices of the whole system. Government school is socialist by design: It takes money from some to pay for the state indoctrination of others. This is unavoidable, as no family can be precisely average -- having 2.54 kids and paying exactly average taxes -- in order to pay their "fair share" of education taxes.

Every family -- yours included -- is paying either more or less than its share of taxes for education. Injustice is unavoidable in this system. If you like me and Thomas Jefferson consider this arrangement to be evil, then work to get the state out of education completely. Start with your own family. And, in the meantime, stop attacking other families for being caught up in a system they didn't create and largely don't want.

37 posted on 12/17/2003 9:56:40 AM PST by Stop Legal Plunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson