What is that supposed to mean, "no election at the end." Is she saying that if Bush is re-elected in 2004, there will never be another election? Another case of a Clinton revealing what is in his/her plans by hurling an accusation at someone else?
That is exactly what she is saying.
Another case of a Clinton revealing what is in his/her plans by hurling an accusation at someone else?
You got it. That is exactly what she is doing.
I caught this, too. And your point is important enough to bear repeating.
It's becoming obvious the desperate rats have looked at the short to longterm political trend in this nation and don't like what they see. The plan now seems to be to radicalize the base with seditious inflammatory charges against Bush in particular and Republicans and conservatives in general.
The recent public remarks by Dean, McDermott, and now Albright Hillary make it pretty clear that they intend to play extra dirty for the duration. This pattern of public remarks began, not accidentally IMO, after their preferred platform for this activity, the Senate Intelligence Committee, was neutralized.
This is dangerous stuff. They're basically inciting hatred and its close cousin, violence.....
What is that supposed to mean, "no election at the end."
I took it to mean that Bush would be free to do whatever he wants since HE is not up for re-election. Presidents feel more free after their second election to be who they truly are because they don't have to face the voters anymore.
-PJ