If this agreement is still in effect do you know if it would be possible for the new ownership and this present administration to break the agreement? If it's still in effect it could be a real problem down the road when and if the anti-gunners get back in power.
My understanding, and I'm not an attorney nor particularly familiar with the case, is that they can't break it. Your concern about anti-gunners is precisely my point.
Maybe there's someone out there who can answer the question with certainty. If so, I'd be very interested in reading his comments.