[RS]

". Even if they show overlapping prescriptions, since they are for different purposes, the law is not applicable."

If you go to one doctor complaing about pain in your right leg, then another for pain in your back, and a third for pain in your left leg - would that not be "different purposes" ? HHmmmmm?

[Always Right]

If you go to one doctor complaing about pain in your right leg, then another for pain in your back, and a third for pain in your left leg - would that not be "different purposes" ? HHmmmmm?

It could be. I doubt if the left vs. right leg would fly, but if you obtained drugs for your back and drugs for your legs, you could get away with it. It depends on the courts interpret the law. But going to an ear specialists and also to your general practioner for your back, I think Rush has a solid defense against this law.