Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Taliesan
We are not arguing over whether it CAN, nor are we arguing over whether it HAS, nor are we arguing over whether it might have in this instance.

Oh, yoohoo, Mr. correlation/causation! I went out of my way to say in my post that there is **not proof**, though I *thought* it more possible than not, because we know about audience response, not holiday shopping, and we know of other instances where it has influenced network decisions.

Get it?

131 posted on 12/16/2003 11:42:49 AM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
We've not even been talking about "proof", which of course is different from "evidence".

My point remains that you have absolutely no evidence to connect the two things you are connecting. Not a shred, not a suggestion. Nothing.

And I doubt I'm going to make you understand that.

133 posted on 12/16/2003 12:06:43 PM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson