Skip to comments.
Couric on Better Behavior in Interview with Dep. Sec. State Armitage (Impact of FR Outcry?)
The Today Show
Posted on 12/16/2003 4:37:23 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-140 next last
To: Lazamataz
You can believe that if you want, Laz but I read the actual script and it was a barfer. The whole affair was nothing more than damage control and had nothing to do with the wailing and screaming of the masses.
J
To: J. L. Chamberlain; Lazamataz
So your theory is that the public outcry was irrelevant and the CBS honchos would have pulled The Reagans in any case, because it didn't meet their elevated artistic standards?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I'm not so sure. Particularly when contrasted with the much more supportive coverage from her counterparts on the ABC and CBS morning show, I believe that the NBC chiefs could have been concerned about the impact on ratings, and had a word with Katie. I'm 100% sure that is what happened.
63
posted on
12/16/2003 5:55:18 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Ladies and Gentlemen....WE GOT HIM!!!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
LOL
64
posted on
12/16/2003 5:55:27 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: J. L. Chamberlain
You can believe that if you want, Laz but I read the actual script and it was a barfer. The whole affair was nothing more than damage control and had nothing to do with the wailing and screaming of the masses. Bull! The CBS execs saw the script MONTHS ago and had NO PLANS to pull the plug on The Reagans. They did so only AFTER the protests.
65
posted on
12/16/2003 5:57:23 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Ladies and Gentlemen....WE GOT HIM!!!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Yes, that's what I'm saying. The thing stunk no matter how it was sliced.
J
To: PJ-Comix
They did so only AFTER the protests. Of course this really only reenforces your need to feel important, shouting from the internet. Sorry PJ but the world ain't all that simple.
J
To: J. L. Chamberlain
Reality shows like ''Big Brother,'' in which one contestant pulled a knife on another, are risky but represent an effort to try something different, CBS executives said Tuesday. Story URL: http://www.realitytvworld.com/index/articles/story.php?s=216
So those shrinking violets at CBS have no problems with reality shows in which contestants pull knives on each other, but get the vapors because The Reagans script wasn't of "Citizen Kane" quality?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It really did seem to set her back.Katies nothing, he can do that to an entire Senate Committee. ;-)
69
posted on
12/16/2003 6:05:48 AM PST
by
StriperSniper
(Sending the Ba'thist to the showers! ;-)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
You don't really mean to imply that a silly reality show is on the same level as a docu-drama about a president, do you?
J
To: J. L. Chamberlain
Of course this really only reenforces your need to feel important, shouting from the internet. Sorry PJ but the world ain't all that simple. Sorry but even the Lefties acknowledge that it was the PROTESTS that caused that series to be pulled. You need a refresher course in the events that caused this. No way in hell that CBS would pull a series they produced for sweeps week just because the script (which they were already completely familiar with) sucked. You actually think Les Moonves didn't know about the script until AFTER the protests?
71
posted on
12/16/2003 6:08:17 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Ladies and Gentlemen....WE GOT HIM!!!)
To: J. L. Chamberlain
You can believe that if you want, Laz but I read the actual script and it was a barfer. And so did Les Moonves months BEFORE the protests and nary a word from him about pulling the series until AFTER the protests. You need to take a timeline refresher course on the events leading to the pulling of this series. Or do you actually believe that Moonves suddenly developed some sort of superior artistic sensibilities only AFTER the protests? If so, then you must believe the Tooth Fairy will be leaving gold coins underneath your pillow tonight.
72
posted on
12/16/2003 6:12:16 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Ladies and Gentlemen....WE GOT HIM!!!)
To: J. L. Chamberlain
Since you're convinced the public outcry doesn't explain why Couric toned down her act this morning, why not reveal the real reason?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Something must explain it. Ah, there you have it. The impulse to haruspicate, or scry.
No, nothing has to explain "it".
74
posted on
12/16/2003 6:12:34 AM PST
by
Taliesan
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It was a chastened Katie Couric on display today. To my fellow FReepers, I say "bravo." I sincerely feel you have made a difference.I've long suspected that many lefties lurk here, including some media heavy weights.
So ... a "Here's looking at you, lurkers" bump.
75
posted on
12/16/2003 6:13:58 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: wita; Lazamataz
>>Perkie hardly describes what I think of when faced with pictures or mention of miss couric.
OK, I'll start using my neighbor Laz's "Al-Qaetie Couric".
76
posted on
12/16/2003 6:14:26 AM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(this space intentionally blank)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I wouldn't be surprised if in light of all the messages received after yesterday's despicable performance an NBC honcho didn't take her aside and advise her to cool her anti-American act.Today show ratings are going south, ABC's GMA is beating them consistantly. Further, Diane Sawyer had has an interview today with GWB, last week Diane was given a Xmas tour of the WH by Laura Bush. Katie hasn't seen the inside of the WH since the Clinton era and as long as the Bush administration is around ... won't.
77
posted on
12/16/2003 6:14:40 AM PST
by
BluH2o
To: Taliesan
Hmm, an effect with no cause. Paging Issac Newton for a re-write!
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Chamberlain probably believes that Saddam's capture this past weekend has NOTHING to do with Al-Duri's capture today. Totally unrelated events according to the world of Chamberlain-Land.
79
posted on
12/16/2003 6:16:06 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Ladies and Gentlemen....WE GOT HIM!!!)
To: Lazamataz
I read somewhere an interview with a network type (it was several years ago); I do recall that he said, as a rule of thumb, the networks estimate that every letter received probably represents 10,000 viewers with the same opinion who didn't bother to write. The scale may different for e-mail, since it's so much easier, but I don't think networks with steadily dropping ratings can afford to ignore their mail or e-mail.
80
posted on
12/16/2003 6:17:03 AM PST
by
maryz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-140 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson