Posted on 12/16/2003 4:25:40 AM PST by Smile-n-Win
Summary: Since stoning people to death is a tradition in parts of the Middle East, that might be the most appropriate way to execute Saddam Hussein. If each relative of someone murdered by Saddam were allowed to throw a stone, the line might stretch back for miles. Television pictures of that line, broadcast throughout the Arab world, could completely undermine any notion that this is just an American vendetta against Moslems.
(Excerpt) Read more at capmag.com ...
I respectfully disagree. When it is good guys vs bad guys, liberals always side with the bad guys without hesitation. Even if it diametrically contradicts what they had been preaching before.
For liberals, words are only a facade behind which to hide their agenda. They don't defend genital mutilation because they think we should respect all cultures; rather, they say we should respect all cultures because they like genital mutilation. Words are only a tool. Unlike us, they never mean what they say, they just say it because it helps them achieve their goal of maximizing human suffering.
Okay, I think Saddam deserves what he'll get... but the above mental image crosses the line. Just like the crowd watching the torture of William Wallace in Braveheart, I feel compelled to step forward and cry out: "MERCY!!!" ;^p
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.