To: Tailgunner Joe
In India, 33% of national positions must now be filled by women...Someone may want to look up the case from India where the "man" sans his normal equipment wanted to run for one of the "womens" political seats...
To: farmfriend; madfly
ping
To: Tailgunner Joe
In India, 33% of national positions must now be filled by women, regardless of the candidates' qualifications or voter preferenceIndia?? Isn't that one of those countries that aborts the baby girls?
That said, watch the feminazis deep six the quota when the candidates start becoming conservative.
4 posted on
12/15/2003 3:07:11 PM PST by
Lizavetta
(Savage is right. Extreme liberalness is a mental disorder.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Thanks! Good post!
5 posted on
12/15/2003 3:10:58 PM PST by
familyop
(Essayons - motto of good, stable psychotics with a purpose)
To: Tailgunner Joe
so they used Orwellian euphemisms like "promoting women's participation in the democratic processes" and "assuring that women's voices are heard." But God forbid they should hear THIS woman's voice, as I disagree with almost everything feminists stand for. Will they protect my rights to participation?
I'm irked, irritated, and embarrassed that so many women are stupid enough to vote for women candidates just because they are women. They don't care what these candidates stand for, they vote on the basis of plumbing and plumbing alone. That's not sexist? So enlightened of them.
6 posted on
12/15/2003 3:33:20 PM PST by
PoisedWoman
(Rat candidates: "What a sorry lot!" says Barbara Bush)
To: Tailgunner Joe
As the corrupt politician Boss Tweed once put it, "I don't care who does the electing just so long as I do the nominating." Does this "Two-Party Cartel" come to mind??
7 posted on
12/15/2003 3:40:25 PM PST by
Digger
To: Tailgunner Joe
People can chew me up on this one if they like. First of all the commies, socialists, and their dim-rat scum brothers and sisters have it all wrong. They speak of equality and fairness while imposing their warped idea of fair upon the rest of us. We all know that. Is it not reasonable to assume that societies on the whole, are not ready to have a great deal of women in positions of leadership? Perhaps in the future there can be more women in those positions. In other words societies can make these decisions on their own, in their own time. To force idea's and agenda's upon the public is the wrong road to travel, and will result in more inequality and anger than we currently have.
8 posted on
12/15/2003 3:42:42 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: RogerFGay
ping
9 posted on
12/15/2003 5:21:37 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Tailgunner Joe
In India, 33% of national positions must now be filled by women, regardless of the candidates' qualifications or voter preference.It's becomming a Clitocracy.
14 posted on
12/17/2003 9:59:52 AM PST by
Consort
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson