Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who's Really In Charge at the White House? (A crapweasel-loving paleoconservative's view)
The Toronto Sun ^ | December 14, 2003 | Eric Margolis

Posted on 12/15/2003 11:06:50 AM PST by quidnunc

Paris – As I walked along the elegant Quai d'Orsay, past France's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Talleyrand's wonderfully cynical bon mot about Napoleon's murder of the Duc d'Enghien kept coming back to me: "Worse than a crime, it was a blunder."

Napoleon's foreign minister could just as well have been speaking of Iraq.

France repeatedly warned the Bush administration against invading Iraq. DGSE, the French intelligence service, had highly placed agents within Saddam Hussein's regime and informed the U.S. Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, posed no threat and would, if invaded, turn into a second Lebanon or West Bank.

Warnings by France and other European powers were sneeringly dismissed by the war's principal architects, among them U.S. Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, whose strategy was based in large part on disinformation from shady defectors and self-serving sources.

Pro-invasion Americans hurled insults at France for impeding Washington's rush to war.

Totally wrong about Iraq, Wolfowitz and fellow neo-cons are now punishing those who were totally right.

France, Germany, Russia, Belgium, Greece, and China — and maybe or maybe not Canada — were blacklisted from $18.6 billion US of "reconstruction" contracts in Iraq.

The laughable reason: "To protect the essential security interests of the United States." Albania and Uzbekistan are approved vendors.

"Reconstruction" is a euphemism for repairing massive damage inflicted on Iraq, formerly the Arab world's most developed nation, by a decade of crushing American-led sanctions and bombing.

French diplomats at the Quai d'Orsay are asking whatever happened to Colin Powell, who is supposed to head U.S. foreign policy? Wolfowitz seems to be running foreign as well as defence policy now. The hapless Powell has been demoted to messenger.

Banning staunch allies like France and Germany from rebuilding Iraq is not only foolishly vindictive and ham-handed, it is downright stupid, a condition now epidemic at the Pentagon's highest civilian echelons.

America's affronted allies, facing domestic outrage over this insult, must now take overt or covert counter-action, worsening U.S.-European relations.

Ironically, the spiteful ban undermines intense U.S. efforts to draw Europe into the Iraq mess.

All this could have been done quietly.

Instead, Wolfowitz created an unnecessary trans-Atlantic fracas that again shows the alarming diplomatic ineptitude and political crassness of the Bush administration. Embarrassingly, the American blacklist was issued just as Bush was calling European leaders, trying to get them to forgive Iraq's huge debts. The president was left red-faced. Many wondered who really was running the administration.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at canoe.ca ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: france; friendofsaddam; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2003 11:06:51 AM PST by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: quidnunc
Sure will be interesting to see what side you come down on when Baker pulls out his broom on the Iraqiots in the Administration.
3 posted on 12/15/2003 11:21:03 AM PST by JohnGalt (Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The meat of the article is here

The exclusion of some of America's oldest friends from Iraq underlines the point that the U.S. invasion was really motivated by big oil and big business, rather than the faux war on terrorism or Baghdad's non-existent unconventional weapons.

Few people realize how important the occupation of oil-rich Iraq is to America's military-industrial-petroleum complex, a major financial backer of Bush and the Republican party. Defence spending, spurred by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, will reach $3.1 trillion US over the next two years - the same amount, in constant dollars, the U.S. spent on World War II!

Much of this bonanza will go to traditional defence contractors. But a growing share will flow to U.S. firms engaged in privatized military and imperial functions. Halliburton, VP Dick Cheney's old firm, got a sweetheart contract to pump and export Iraqi oil.

Brown & Root, a Halliburton subsidiary, builds and runs U.S. military bases in Iraq, and other nations, supplying food, cleaning, water, sewage and power.

Other little-known firms with close links to the Bush administration have over 10,000 "civilian" (read ex-military) contractors in Iraq. They receive billions of dollars to train Iraq's new U.S.-run police and army, create security forces, field mercenary units and "protect" the U.S.-installed figurehead in Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai. In fact, a third of this year's $87 billion allocated for Iraq, Afghanistan and Central Asia will be spent on U.S. private military contractors.

For these members of the military-industrial complex, Iraq is a gold mine. Pentagon plans to create three major, permanent bases in Iraq and link them to new U.S. bases in Central Asia - what I call America's imperial oil route - will guarantee decades of lucrative work and generous funding for the Republican party.

The French, who have a long history of knocking off puppet African rulers who get out of line, have no great moral qualms about U.S. military intervention in Iraq, but they view Iraq as a legitimate sphere of European economic influence. Paris is furious Washington is elbowing Europe out of this rich market and stirring up an Islamic hornet's nest against the West.

There are at least five million impoverished Muslims in France living on the edge of society, 40% of them under 20 years of age - fertile ground for unrest and violence.

Washington may eventually back down over the Iraq contract dispute. Yet each week, the Bush administration seems to finds new ways to antagonize, alienate, and infuriate Europe and the Muslim world.

Too bad Alterman chooses to treat the Administration and its neocon supporters as boobs. There are serious questions about how to treat the Muslim world, which sits atop resources vital to the West, and about who should control those resources.

4 posted on 12/15/2003 11:25:13 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
From the linked article:

"The return of Baker - long-time consiglieri to the Bush family whose last mission was to secure all of Florida's electoral votes for George W in 2000 regardless of the state's actual voting laws or how people actually voted - made an already bad week for administration hawks much, much worse."

No bias in that source!

5 posted on 12/15/2003 11:42:22 AM PST by Sam's Army (This just in: Saddam Endorses Dean for 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Lobe is a CFR shill. This article is just another one of his fantasies. The world has moved on.
6 posted on 12/15/2003 11:48:34 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Anti-Bush rant. Not worth reading.
7 posted on 12/15/2003 11:50:05 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry; All
Actually, IMHO, the real "meat of the story" is just this short excerpt:

The French, who have a long history of knocking off puppet African rulers who get out of line, have no great moral qualms about U.S. military intervention in Iraq, but they view Iraq as a legitimate sphere of European economic influence. Paris is furious Washington is elbowing Europe out of this rich market and stirring up an Islamic hornet's nest against the West.

There are at least five million impoverished Muslims in France living on the edge of society, 40% of them under 20 years of age - fertile ground for unrest and violence.

Perhaps "France" would recognize a "moral qualm" if they had any, but instead they take this excessively cynical view not of "moral qualms" but of "moral purpose" in the Iraq war. The "oil" argument might even be convincing to the equally cynical, but the only case this writer makes is that France is afraid of their Muslim immigrant population (is this somehow attributable to the "evil American administration's purported oil war" ?!) and they're really ticked off not to get their hands on "primary contracts" paid for by American TAX dollars...they can bid for everything else, unless they're afraid maybe the new Iraq will remember their support for the old regime, and summarily throw them out of the country, or worse...

8 posted on 12/15/2003 11:52:51 AM PST by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
?

I read it as an anti-Iraqiot Architects article not an anti-Bush rant.

Are you sure you are not confusing the PNAC crowd with Bush?

9 posted on 12/15/2003 11:53:16 AM PST by JohnGalt (Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
The first report that Baker had been brought in to sweep out the Iraq architects was in the American Conservative, and it was cited in the Lobe article. Lobe has been a longtime chronicler of the neocon folks, though the CFR reference is interesting in that it makes him pretty much an establishment critic.

A few other links on the weeks past events:

Red-faced Pentagon delays Iraq tenders

NEOCONS BLACKMAIL BUSH?

WOLFOWITZ’S PREMEDITATED BLUNDER

10 posted on 12/15/2003 11:56:30 AM PST by JohnGalt (Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Read the headline. Nothing but the old Haliburton, anti-Bush garbage like "Yet each week, the Bush administration seems to finds new ways to antagonize, alienate, and infuriate Europe and the Muslim world. ".

Next he will blame the JOOOOS for Iraq.

11 posted on 12/15/2003 11:57:50 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Far too funny to excerpt. Margolis concludes:

The exclusion of some of America's oldest friends from Iraq underlines the point that the U.S. invasion was really motivated by big oil and big business, rather than the faux war on terrorism or Baghdad's non-existent unconventional weapons.

Few people realize how important the occupation of oil-rich Iraq is to America's military-industrial-petroleum complex, a major financial backer of Bush and the Republican party. Defence spending, spurred by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, will reach $3.1 trillion US over the next two years - the same amount, in constant dollars, the U.S. spent on World War II!

Much of this bonanza will go to traditional defence contractors. But a growing share will flow to U.S. firms engaged in privatized military and imperial functions. Halliburton, VP Dick Cheney's old firm, got a sweetheart contract to pump and export Iraqi oil.

Brown & Root, a Halliburton subsidiary, builds and runs U.S. military bases in Iraq, and other nations, supplying food, cleaning, water, sewage and power.

Other little-known firms with close links to the Bush administration have over 10,000 "civilian" (read ex-military) contractors in Iraq. They receive billions of dollars to train Iraq's new U.S.-run police and army, create security forces, field mercenary units and "protect" the U.S.-installed figurehead in Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai. In fact, a third of this year's $87 billion allocated for Iraq, Afghanistan and Central Asia will be spent on U.S. private military contractors.

For these members of the military-industrial complex, Iraq is a gold mine. Pentagon plans to create three major, permanent bases in Iraq and link them to new U.S. bases in Central Asia - what I call America's imperial oil route - will guarantee decades of lucrative work and generous funding for the Republican party.

The French, who have a long history of knocking off puppet African rulers who get out of line, have no great moral qualms about U.S. military intervention in Iraq, but they view Iraq as a legitimate sphere of European economic influence. Paris is furious Washington is elbowing Europe out of this rich market and stirring up an Islamic hornet's nest against the West.

There are at least five million impoverished Muslims in France living on the edge of society, 40% of them under 20 years of age - fertile ground for unrest and violence.

Washington may eventually back down over the Iraq contract dispute. Yet each week, the Bush administration seems to finds new ways to antagonize, alienate, and infuriate Europe and the Muslim world.

As a French diplomat observed to me, "Monsieur bin Laden must be tres content."

[hoot]

12 posted on 12/15/2003 11:58:31 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
If you want a European sphere of influence go get one. But if you are waiting for the Americans to hand you a sphere of influence don't hold your breath.
13 posted on 12/15/2003 12:07:40 PM PST by reed_inthe_wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Apologies, I thought you were referring to the article I linked to, "Baker's return spells Cheney's heartburn."

Margolis is a liberal, makes no contention of being a conservative, let alone a paleo-conservative, but the guy who posted this article classifies him as a paleo-con.



14 posted on 12/15/2003 12:11:26 PM PST by JohnGalt (Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Too bad Alterman chooses to treat the Administration and its neocon supporters as boobs

Ah c'mon ,Larry;do you expect otherwise from this slug?
:- )
15 posted on 12/15/2003 12:14:23 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army
From the linked article:
"The return of Baker - long-time consiglieri to the Bush family whose last mission was to secure all of Florida's electoral votes for George W in 2000 regardless of the state's actual voting laws or how people actually voted - made an already bad week for administration hawks much, much worse."

Sounds like he's plagarizing Mo Dowd.

16 posted on 12/15/2003 12:16:25 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Ladies and gentleman, we got him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
The return of Baker - long-time consiglieri to the Bush family whose last mission was to secure all of Florida's electoral votes for George W in 2000 regardless of the state's actual voting laws or how people actually voted

Anti-Bush moron.

17 posted on 12/15/2003 12:18:27 PM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
This linked article is a pile of bovine excrement:
" The exclusion of some of America's oldest friends from Iraq underlines the point that the U.S. invasion was really motivated by big oil and big business, rather than the faux war on terrorism or Baghdad's non-existent unconventional weapons. "

Here's a hint:
1. If they dont help us in our hour of need they are NOT 'allies' or "friends". ANd if they further express fear of our power and want to compete *against* us (viz. France) they are not allies at all!
2. It is laughable to call liberation of Iraq about Big Oil. That is moronic bumper-sticker-level illogic.
3. "faux war on terror" jeez, and we've had documented links between saddam and al quaeda, we've had *hundreds* of terrorists caught worldwide, including Khalid Sheik Muhammed
the mastermind of 9/11.

Is this guy living in a cave?!? Does he ignore all of reality?

4. ah something 'nonexistent' managed to kill thousands in Hallabjah.

5. He adds to the error of illogic the error of innumeracy: " Defence spending, spurred by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, will reach $3.1 trillion US over the next two years -" No It Wont! Defense spending is about $400 billion, we would need almost a decade to reach that level. Moreover, the spending as a Percentage of GNP is still *less* than duing Vietnam and less than under Reagan (or even carter for that matter!).

I could go on, but this stream of disgusting venom wrapped around phony conspiracy theories layered with a complete abandonment of facts shows one thing: Bush's enemies would rather be wrong than support our President.
18 posted on 12/15/2003 12:22:47 PM PST by WOSG (The only thing that will defeat us is defeatism itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
How you imagine that Lobe is a conservative or that Taki and Co. over at the "American Conservative" are really conservatives is beyond me. Contrary to whining of the liberal press, Iraq is going quite well. France blinked today and Germany will soon. A year and a half from now we most likely will watch Iran fall. It is just these sort of people like Lobe, Taki and Buchannan that managed to undermine the conservative movemnt all these years. They are elites snobs - they are just 19th century "liberals" ans opposed to our 20th century socialist "liberals." They all have contempt for the common man and contempt for the country. They do not even know the country, really They know that this is a one of two make or break period left for the CFR crowd and are quite anxious that they might be left out of the commissariat.
19 posted on 12/15/2003 12:26:03 PM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
When did I suggest Lobe was a conservative?

He reads like a leftist, though I noted the CFR credentials were interesting since it would make him an establishment leftists.

LOL

I thought you were 'legit' for a moment there, but you are 'just another' Pseudocons. Do you even know what or who the CFR is?

In your opinion, why was Baker brought in and why did Wolfowitz try to undermine the administration?
20 posted on 12/15/2003 12:30:27 PM PST by JohnGalt (Attention Pseudocons: Wilsonianrepublic.com is still available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson