[singsong]

Yes, you did imply that wealth is zero-sum. In fact, you said it when you said the "equilibrium is only down for us," one of the few parts of your post that made any sense.

In that same sentence I imlied that wealth is NOT a zero-sum game. Wealth is spent on something. For some cultures it increases the quality of life and personal independence. For others it increases population and political ambitions. When the first is sold out for the second, well, we all go down... You have to work on that comprehension ability of yours.

[The Old Hoosier]

You said wealth is zero sum. And from what you keep writing, it's clear you don't understand the argument. And you can't spell either.