To: Hipixs
Good post. It seemed as if Rummy was dancing a bit, though, when Stahl pressed him on the details of interrogation. I don't care if they deprive him of sleep, and such, but I do find Rumsfeld's lack of answers kinda strange.....
5 posted on
12/15/2003 7:08:06 AM PST by
r9etb
To: r9etb
...I do find Rumsfeld's lack of answers kinda strange..... Read to me like he didn't want to get into any specifics regarding the definition of torture. He does a pretty good soft shoe, eh?
FGS
6 posted on
12/15/2003 7:12:15 AM PST by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: r9etb
If I was Rummy and had been in the same studio, I'd have reached over and choked Leslie Stahl at the moment she mentioned "torture."
To: r9etb
Do you seriously think it is a good idea for Rumseld to acknowledge the possible torture of Saddam Hussein. And do you think we wouldn't do it if it meant gaining valuable information that would prevent the additional loss of innocent lives down the road?
9 posted on
12/15/2003 7:41:03 AM PST by
SamAdams76
(Merry Christmas!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson