Skip to comments.
In Their Own Words: The Democratic Candidates (re: Saddams Capture)
The New York Times ^
| 12/15/2003
| New York Times
Posted on 12/14/2003 10:01:47 PM PST by EUPHORIC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Regarding all but Sharpton they simply have no honor and the worst case of sour grapes ever for not mentioning that our Presidents policies have a LOT to do with us grabbing Saddam.
As for Al Sharpton? He just wnats to see the UN come in and install Socialism rather then give the people in Iraw there own voice on the matter. Just like they have everywhere else.
1
posted on
12/14/2003 10:01:48 PM PST
by
EUPHORIC
To: EUPHORIC
wnats = wants.
Grrrr....
2
posted on
12/14/2003 10:02:49 PM PST
by
EUPHORIC
(Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
To: EUPHORIC
Iraw = Iraq.
Grrrrrr!!!!!
3
posted on
12/14/2003 10:03:42 PM PST
by
EUPHORIC
(Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
To: EUPHORIC
John F Kerry is the biggest ass of all once again.
4
posted on
12/14/2003 10:03:49 PM PST
by
Dan from Michigan
("if you wanna run cool, you got to run, on heavy heavy fuel" - Dire Straits)
To: EUPHORIC
Oh, thats okay. You have to know that NONE of the candidates are sleeping well tonight. Howie Dean is up rewriting his "big foreign policy address" this very moment. Lots of white-out all over the "Where is Saddam" stuff. John Kerry is tossing and turning saying F$%#!, while his wife says "Not tonight". Gephardt is busy applying more Red dye #5 to his hair, and Wes Clark takes the stand against Milosevic in the morning.
5
posted on
12/14/2003 10:07:22 PM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: EUPHORIC
"Saddam Rat Caught"
By: Best of Latin America
The Clinic, Santiago, Chile
December 14, 2003
7
posted on
12/14/2003 10:15:22 PM PST
by
summer
To: Baynative
Al Gore is and always was a total loser.
8
posted on
12/14/2003 10:17:49 PM PST
by
blackfarm
To: EUPHORIC
Pretty much everyone contains the standard platitudes about supporting the troops, but each one is also a backhanded compliment.
Each candidate is a scummy weasel of the highest order.
9
posted on
12/14/2003 10:25:00 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(“...how can I use the bathroom when my people are in bondage?”)
To: EUPHORIC
Allright Leiberman !!
Sound like a jerk and attack Dean at the same time !
10
posted on
12/14/2003 10:34:24 PM PST
by
RS
(nc)
To: Chad Fairbanks
The Democrats want to Internationalize.It is their mantra.They sound like they are running for Secy.General of the UN instead of President of the US.
11
posted on
12/14/2003 10:37:41 PM PST
by
MEG33
To: EUPHORIC
To: EUPHORIC
Not one of them could summon up the class to congratulate President Bush along the military. IMHO that would have served them better with voters than desperately looking for somehting to carp about.
13
posted on
12/14/2003 10:42:06 PM PST
by
Hugin
To: Chad Fairbanks
Agree wholeheartedly, "Chad".
To: Dan from Michigan
JOHN KERRY If we had done this with a sufficient number of troops, if we had done this in a globalized way, if we had brought more people to the table, we might have caught Saddam Hussein sooner. We might have had less loss of life. We would be in a stronger position today with respect to what we're doing.Amazing, huh? He must have been using the F word all day long....
To: EUPHORIC
JOHN KERRY
"Ifwe had done this with a sufficient number of troops, if we had done this in a globalized way, if we had brought more people to the table, we might have caught Saddam Hussein sooner" If ifs and buts were candy and nuts we would all have a merry Christmas.
16
posted on
12/14/2003 10:47:24 PM PST
by
Davea
To: EUPHORIC
Duplicate thread running here (this one seems to have been first), though the other poster said they'd run a check. Anyway, I'll post here what I posted there.
Don'tcha just love it when a plan comes together!!
Problem is, I am very much afraid that if all of Bush's detractors continue to harp about turning Iraq over to the UN, that Bush might attempt to "triangulate" yet again.
We don't need the UN in the US and we sure as hell don't need the UN in Iraq. I just hope Bush does not yield on this issue the way he has done on education, CFR, and medicare.
17
posted on
12/14/2003 10:49:15 PM PST
by
bjcintennessee
(Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
To: Baynative
THANK GOD I'M NOT A DEMOCRAT!!!!!!
18
posted on
12/14/2003 10:50:00 PM PST
by
pamibach
(justgoing to praise H im until He returns)
To: Hugin
Well to be fair Dean and Gephardt did say it was a "great day for the administration". But just wait until the trial of Saddam, when all of his horrible crimes are cataloged for the world to see. And not by the Administration, but by Iraqis. How is Dean going to defend his position then?
19
posted on
12/14/2003 10:51:41 PM PST
by
ejdrapes
To: MEG33
Good point - it DOES sound like that. Of course, they've been selling out this nation for decades, so I don't see it as anything new...
20
posted on
12/14/2003 10:53:38 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(“...how can I use the bathroom when my people are in bondage?”)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson