[vanmorrison]

You know what, I'm beginning to conclude that this "Hillary in 2008" thinking is utter nonsense. After Bush decimates Dean and Gore and Clinton next year, and completely routs the Democrat Party, bringing it to a state of inconsequentiality, how can anyone continue to believe that, after five more years of the new Teddy Roosevelt, that is, GWBush, with his military and economic success unseen in a president in a hundred years, there is any way possible that a has-been, also-ran, baggage-laden, skanky jerk like "Hillary" has a chance in hell to replace whoever Bush's hand-picked successor may be. Right?

[TomT in NJ]

Right! How would Hillary be able to beat Jeb?

[SBprone]

Somebody will run for the Dems. It might be Hillary or it might not. But consider this: The weaker the Dems are as a party four years hence the more likely they will run somebody like Hillary who is clearly unsuited to the office and who is widely disliked within the electorate even though she is loved by many hardcore Dems. In other words, if they are still acting like losers in four years they will nominate a loser and Hillary fits the bill.