Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: finnman69
But the Stryker replaced tanks not Hummers.
49 posted on 12/14/2003 2:11:50 AM PST by Cacophonous (For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. (Luke 2:11))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cacophonous
No, no , no....the Stryker vehicles are replacing light forces with medium forces. Again, the question is not if it is better than a tank, but is it better than a guy on foot or in a truck.

Of the 5 active duty brigades transforming to Styrker Bdes, three were light (as in move by jumping out of planes or by truck), and the other was the 2nd Cav Regt, which has been in Hummers for a decade now.

The second question is the vehicle the best we could do. Many of us say it was a good interim quick shot at it given very constrained time schedules. Others say we could have done better and need to look at other interim vehicles. All of us know that the Army is lookig at a totally new vehilce for the long term (called the Future Combat System), that has never been invisioned as an unpgraded Stryker or an Upgraded M113.

55 posted on 12/14/2003 7:45:23 AM PST by Proud Legions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson