[VeritatisSplendor]

Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable.

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

Maybe, maybe not. If both are true, it is plausible that all were in action at the same time...

[lstanle]

"Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable"

Its genuine alright, a fake memo would also tell how the WMD were divided between Syria and Iran.

[secretagent]

Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable.

Good catch! This, by itself, puts me in the disbeliever camp.

This smells like a set-up to embarrass Bush, like the Niger forgery.

(Now to read the rest of the thread)

[Toskrin]

Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link.

My thoughts as well. One memo conveniently sorts out the links between Mohammed Atta, Abu Nidal, Saddam Hussein, Bashir Assad, and uranium from Niger? Yea, right.

[cookcounty]

" Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable."

Bogus Alert?

On second reading, I picked that up, too. Even if the whole Niger uranium story we heard before was accurate, it wasn't that big of a deal and had nothing to do with 9-11. That both were discussed in the same Saddam- Al-Tikriti memo is just a little too cute. Be very skeptical of this.