Insight fromt he NYT!
1 posted on
12/13/2003 6:47:03 AM PST by
diotima
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: AnnaZ
ping!
2 posted on
12/13/2003 6:48:17 AM PST by
diotima
To: diotima
How many here can dispose a psychotic tyrant in a land filled with psychotic terrorists and institute a system of democracy in less than a year raise your hand. Enough said.
3 posted on
12/13/2003 6:50:38 AM PST by
metalboy
(I`m still waiting for the mass protests against Al Qaida and Saddam)
To: diotima
NYT team of crack reportersYeah, they're on crack alright.
4 posted on
12/13/2003 6:54:38 AM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: diotima
As if all this was not depressing enough, Eric Lichtblau and Timothy O'Brien reported yesterday in The Times that federal efforts to uncover terrorists' financing networks and smash them had been crippled by bureaucratic wrangling in Washington. That groups like FAIR and others are constantly screaming about discrimination against ragheads and their charities doesn't help much either.
6 posted on
12/13/2003 7:03:49 AM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Proud member - Neoconservative Power Vortex)
To: diotima
I'm guessing we will stay for five more years...a dim gets elected withdraws the troops and another great imam Ayatolla or arab-muslim strong man riding a big white horse seduces his gullible people into supporting him...again
And four years after that another pubbie gets elected and we are back in...
Some people are incapable of democratic form of govt....without the internal policeman...
you need an external one....anarchy is not an option...
7 posted on
12/13/2003 7:04:56 AM PST by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: diotima
The Noo Yawk Times is a stinking, fly-covered turd in the landscape of journalism.
Every word they print is a lie, including "and" and "the".
9 posted on
12/13/2003 7:08:41 AM PST by
Lazamataz
("With an Iron Fist, We Will Lead Humanity to Happiness." - Translation of sign at Solovki Gulag)
To: diotima
Regarding your note, NY Times items can be run in full. (Exception: if they were syndicated from a site covered by the
settlement, for example the Washington Post).
Thank you for asking.
To: diotima
Those foul mouthed reprobates! The NYT is nothing more that an insane asylum that allows the lobotomy and shock therapy patients to "write" articles. Their entire paper is a steaming pile.
12 posted on
12/13/2003 7:20:34 AM PST by
Jaysun
(Get real, Control-Everybody-But-Yourselves freaks!)
To: diotima
The New York Times reliably advances the interests of anyone opposing the United States. How progress in Baghdad can be achieved by a detour through Paris or Bonn they don't detail, but they insists such a path is the only avenue to success.
Why doesn't the NYT just pick up lock stock and barrel and move to Paris, so they can be closer to home?
To: diotima
"Frustrated by suicide bombings and guerrilla violence, American military officers resort to the kind of harsh tactics that have caused endless ill will in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
They are soooooooo dying to make this analogy, I feel their hate.
14 posted on
12/13/2003 7:32:14 AM PST by
Helms
(Liberalism is a faux compassion that condescends at best and subjugates at worse)
To: diotima
a catalog of easily predictable, and widely predicted, pitfalls. More like a catalog of predictions made by the fiasco prone Old Grey "Lady" which have gone incandescently wrong. I am amazed they would even go there.
To: diotima
These same folks made some horrendous predictions back in April relating to our push towards Baghdad. Why would anyone listen to them now?
16 posted on
12/13/2003 7:53:32 AM PST by
squidly
To: diotima
I guess that to the NYT, "crack" reporting means bending over and pulling hard in order to obtain the story...
17 posted on
12/13/2003 7:56:30 AM PST by
trebb
To: diotima
Isn't this about where we did not want to be at this point? While the Bush administration says things are going well in Iraq, the news from the American-led occupation is looking like a catalog of easily predictable, and widely predicted, pitfalls. Oh, well, heck, then we should not have entered WWII. Certainly there were pitfalls in those conflicts.
Are these guys at the NYT really this stupid or do they just think we all are?
18 posted on
12/13/2003 7:56:53 AM PST by
BJungNan
To: diotima
FR should ban postings of New York Times articles the same as posts from other sites are not allowed. It is all just drivel and why even give them the recognition.
19 posted on
12/13/2003 8:00:21 AM PST by
BJungNan
To: diotima
Instead of driving away France, Germany, Russia and Canada with financial sanctions, the president should be creating the room for compromise that will lead to those countries' sending money and troops to Iraq. That would help to create a secure enough environment for the United Nations to come in and take over the nation-building responsibilities, giving the occupation an international face. When France, Germany, Russia, Canada and the UN were in town, Saddam's feet-first chippers were going full blast, kids were being tortured and maimed in front of their parents, the rape rooms were full, and the mass grave diggers couldn't keep up with the supply. The Iraqis can do without a second round of that particular international face.
20 posted on
12/13/2003 8:26:14 AM PST by
Dahoser
(I can't see the content of your character if you keep painting a color over it.)
To: diotima
Instead of driving away France, Germany, Russia and Canada with financial sanctions, the president should be creating the room for compromise that will lead to those countries' sending money and troops to Iraq. That would help to create a secure enough environment for the United Nations to come in and take over the nation-building responsibilities, giving the occupation an international face. The paper of retards has spoken.
To: diotima
The Army has to run intelligence gathering operations in Iraq. To say that they shouldn't is to say that they should be defeated, that we should be defeated.
How else are you going to run intelligence operations than have Iraqis do almost all of the field work? If not the Iraqis, who should do it? Eskimos? American Liberals? Oprah Winfrey?
23 posted on
12/13/2003 8:53:59 AM PST by
Iris7
("Duty, Honor, Country". The first of these is Duty, and is known only through His Grace)
To: diotima
What's black and white and Red all over?
The New York Times...
24 posted on
12/13/2003 8:57:14 AM PST by
Tamzee
(Pennsylvanians for Bush! Join http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PA4BushCheney/)
To: diotima
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. -- Albert Einstein Einstein is only half right, but the Old Gray Lady at the Crooked "T" almost never gets it right.
25 posted on
12/13/2003 9:54:53 AM PST by
OESY
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson