"He fed socialist communitarian philosophy to several generations of young readers."The comparison to Reagan is a good one. Heinlein preceded Reagan and Goldwater in promoting a libertarian form of conservatism that rejected compulsory "traditional morality" in favor of personal liberty and personal responsibility. To call this "communitarian" is completely absurd, when indeed it is cultural conservatism that is a form of communitarianism. Indeed, literate cultural conservatives hate Heinlein for the same reason their less educated brethren disdain Reagan, they separated their pet causes from the basic philosophies of the Right, and indeed many of us not only do not embrace them, we oppose them.Balderdash. His change to libertarianism came long before his novels became popular (I think somewhat after he married Virginia). In that, he was much like Reagan, whose philsophy underwent a change after marrying Nancy). His novels have ALL fostered individual freedom and liberty---not "communitarianims".
The only novel I can think of that even comes remotely close to a sort of "communitarian" point of view is "Starship Troopers", in which the right to vote is restricted to those citizens who have voluntarily served a term of "government service".Not even there. Service was 100% voluntary and even, to a degree, discouraged. Heinlein once said that a nation which needs conscription to defend itself does not deserve to be defended.
Growing up, he was my main conservative influence (along with Goldwater) as well as my main agnostic influence.
-Eric
Well, I agree that the connection is tenuous, but voting in ST "is" related to "community service". And in REAL "communitarianism" (as opposed to the new version, which is just communism with a name change), service to the community IS voluntary (REAL communitarianism was practiced in the US---think barn-raising (and school and church-raising) as examples).