Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HighWheeler
There really was no Tomcat C, they went from A+, which was just the new engines, to the B, with better avionics to include air-to-mud, to the D, with the new digital radar and AIM-120 support.

Let me tell you that the F-110 powered Tomcats were fantastic. At 25 ft or below, we beat up on Eagles like they stole something. Only altitude kept them alive when we hassled. We had every advantage until the air got thin where the Tomcat wing does not work well enough to sustain corner speed. The only kid who ever beat me when I was flying the F-16N, was in a Tomcat B. (he cheated, though:-))

The single biggest benefit of the GE's was the ability to throttle slam without worrying what was going on with the compressors. With the old TF-30, you had to baby the throttle. Restarts? Flawless. Great stall resistance, due to the faster second stage, and acceleration was incredible. Just a great package all around. The problem is that it all came too late.

96 posted on 12/14/2003 8:28:49 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Pukin Dog
Thanks, Pukin, that matches what I had heard about the GE engines from the B-1 bomber squads at Dyess.

Those guys loved the F101, which was design modified to make the F110. The F110 had some improvements to it after the long development phase of the F101.

Thanks


97 posted on 12/14/2003 8:40:24 AM PST by HighWheeler (A chainsaw don't know the difference between a laig and a lawg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson