Replies

"So far, they've been nothing but a plague on the human race."

Like any plague it needs first to be contained, and then eradicated. Like any disease it serves no good purpose and has no good end.

Islam is an evil disease. It is NOT a religion but a cult. That is why we do not hear of selfless acts of assistance to the less fortunate of the world from this cult... only of death and subjugation.

Have you seen an "Islam Charities" a "Moslem Peace Corps" or a "Allah's Children's Hospital". No and you won't. It is a cult of taking not a religion of giving.

The only way the world can end good with Islam is when Islam is ended in it's present form.

There are four factors here working simultaneously, but in different degrees in different geographical areas.

1. The destructive nature of world-wide liberalisnm.

2. The race card.

3. Israel.

4. Oil.

1.) World-wide liberalism is a peculiar form of reflexive sadism that will do anything that weakens or destroys this country. Islam is an exquisite tool of torture to inflict such sadism.

Most people are paniced by accusations of racism. The opposite of racism to be demonstrated is declared to be unconditionally acceptant multicuralism. The problem with the doctrine of unconditionally acceptant multiculturalism is that it is causing us to embrace or tolerate, suicidally, actions and mentalities that no sane or intelligent person or people that intends to survive would accept. Mohammedism and its actions would not be acceptable to members of the sane intelligent world. Coordinate with this we have entered into a perioud of profound gutlessness.

3.) Support of Israel causes us to be drawn into the politics and machinations of the Middle East. That's not a condemnation of Israel. It's a fact.

4.) Oil. We have got ourselves into a position in which dependence upon Middle Eastern oil has placed us in the position of tolerating Islamic madness, worldwide, as part of the cost. Confronting the nature of Islam will crate a temper tantrum and our automobile will stop running. Did I care whether Saddam Hussein invaded Saudi Arabia? Do I care whether the Shiites and Sunnis kill each other off? I don't care any more that our goverment cares about Islamics slaughtering non Islamics in Africa or India. As far as I'm concerned we could wall off the area Middle Eastern and let the kooks and hotheads there all kill each other. Howver, as a practical matter disturbaces in the area would also disturb our supply of gasoline and American roads would be filled with stalled cars with empty gas tanks. That's how, or why, we got into the first Gulf War.

"This expansion started with the extreme wealth created with the oil money. In this case, the oil 'money is the root of all evil.' "

A cursory reading of Middle Eastern Religion shows that murder, rape, evangelism by the sword, theft, oppression of the weak and the non-violent has been problematic in that region of the world ever since the ascendancy of Muhammed's example and teaching.

While muslims love to wallow in the pity of victimhood wrought by so-called Chirstian crusades, they do not like for people to remember that the Middle East was predominantly Judeo-Christian until the rise of Muhammed's hoards used the sword to kill or forcibly convert its populace from the onset of Muhammed's syncretism.

Jerusalem, the present and past object of muslim designs, never is even mentioned in the Quran. There was not a single muslim in Jerusalem when the Quran was written in the 7th Century AD. Muslims captured it by force of arms in Islamic jihads which predate the so-called Christian crusades by more than three centuries.

Islamic hoards swept across and conquered the Arabian Peninsula, the fertile Crescent, present day Turkey, Northern Africa and jumped the Straits of Gibraltar in less than one hundred years after the rise of Muhammed. Its progress was stopped cold on October 10, 732 AD in the Battle of Tours near the River Loire in France. Charles Martel, the grandfather of Charlesmagnes, led Frankish tribes to defeat Abd-er-Rahman's superior numbers of muslims and saved Europe from Islamicization. For had the muslim won that battle--as Gibbon observed--instead of spires in Oxford there would have been minarets.

So this problem of the spreading of Islam by the sword is not a new phenomenon. It is inherent in the teachings and example of Muhammed, a bloody man himself, who fought in twenty-eight battles dcuring his violent life. It is the reason for the "growth" of Islam and is the greatest threat to world peace since the fall of the USSR.

Islam is a religion which teaches that Allah wants you send your son to die for him; Christianity is a faith which teaches that God sent His son to die for you.