Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/12/2003 8:24:47 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pan_Yans Wife
Quite a quandary. If they can't persuade the Iraqis to let them stay for a while longer, what to do with 'em? Maybe give them back their guns on condition they go out and fight Ansar-al-Aslam, or however you spell it.
2 posted on 12/12/2003 8:57:49 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I wasn't actually aware such an action was contemplated. Well, we do have a certain responsibility inasmuch as they trusted us (or feared us) enough to give up their arms. I'm thinking maybe this issue should just disappear and we start having serious conversations with these folks about what happens in Iran after the mullahs fall.
5 posted on 12/12/2003 9:41:12 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pan_Yans Wife

6 posted on 12/12/2003 9:44:18 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Washington must provide the "relevant protection offered to members of the (MKO) by the Geneva Convention, which categorizes them as civilians.

An organized militia bearing arms in an attempt to overthrow an established government = civilians?

I haven't actually checked in with the Geneva Convention on this, but I'm highly suspicious of the conclusion, and of the kinds of people who use such "questionable" tactics.

9 posted on 12/12/2003 11:25:11 PM PST by irv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson