Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cake_crumb
cake_crumb wrote:
For some reason, he really expected thebad parts to be struck down by the SCOTUS. And so they would have been if the SCOTUS was doing it's job. Instead, the SCOTUS is doing the fascists' job.
Why would he expect SCOTUS to honor their oaths of office if he wasn't willing to honor his own oath of office? I never understood that excuse.

It would have been so easy for Bush to have vetoed this. Not to mention that it was the right thing to do.

He simply could have shown that NAACP ad with the pickup truck and said, "I might not have liked this, but I believe they had a right to produce it and show it on television. This law is un-American because it makes ads like that illegal." It wasn't that hard to explain, and it wouldn't have cost much "political capital" to either eliminate this crap altogether, or to get a better law with the most blatantly unconstitutional provisions removed.

Instead, he put his party above the Constitution, and that's unacceptable from anyone. Democrats do that and that's why I don't vote for Democrats. I expected better from Bush.

36 posted on 12/11/2003 7:40:35 PM PST by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: cc2k
I don't understand the SCOTUS's and Bush's (particulary Bush's) unconcern about their oaths. Don't they understand the ramifications of "so help me God"? If they don't now I suspect in fifty years they will. I wouldn't want to be making the decisions they have made given the oaths they have given.
39 posted on 12/11/2003 7:57:14 PM PST by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson