Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The objective is to guarantee freedom to every French citizen, with the only restriction that the common rules be respected," he said

I was looking for a comment like this. Whenever some restrictive law is introduced which curtails and suppresses the public expression of faith, the word "freedom" is seldom far away. Usually used in a sense which is the exact opposite of its true meaning.

The USA is a shining example of this.

1 posted on 12/11/2003 3:59:53 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow
The mark of the state may be allowed on the forehead or headgear.
2 posted on 12/11/2003 4:16:50 PM PST by kdf1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
This is exactly the type of backasswards legislation that happens with these "separation of church and state" people. Their form of activism nearly always leads to state restriction of the church. That's not separation. Telling a muslim that she cannot wear hajib is ridiculous, as this is mandated by her religion. This is not freedom. We must be careful as conservatives that we not seek to restrict the behavior of others to that which we approve of, as well. We cannot convince the world to respect religious freedom if we also seek to control the activities on nonreligious people.
3 posted on 12/11/2003 4:18:09 PM PST by AdequateMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
The French will burn Christians at the stake or in Wacos before they'd ban Muslim headscarfs. Their Arab masters won't permit it. The French will, however, be able to use the issue to extort even more Arab/Saudi money.
4 posted on 12/11/2003 5:29:14 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson