Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security for Mexicans closer to reality; U.S. discussing plan
WorldNetDaily ^ | December 11, 2003

Posted on 12/11/2003 3:48:26 PM PST by yonif

The prospect of millions of Mexicans receiving United States Social Security checks is moving closer to reality.

The Gannett News Service reports U.S. and Mexican officials are discussing a "totalization" agreement that would transfer hundreds of millions of dollars in payments south of the border. The plan would allow documented and undocumented immigrants to return home but still collect U.S. benefits.

WorldNetDaily reported the idea to merge both countries' Social Security systems was pushed late last year by Mexican President Vincente Fox as payback from President George W. Bush for failing to secure major new immigration reforms beneficial to Mexico City.

"When the legalization talks began going nowhere, the Mexicans began focusing on this," Maria Blanco, national senior counsel for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, told the Washington Post.

Excerpts from a U.S. Social Security Administration memo dated December 2002 said the agreement "is expected to move forward at an accelerated pace."

The pact is the latest and largest attempt by Washington and Mexico City to ensure that people from one country working in another aren't taxed twice for Social Security benefits. In the first year alone, the agreement is expected to trigger 37,000 claims from Mexicans working in the U.S. legally who paid Social Security taxes but haven't been able to claim their checks, said the memo, prepared by Ted Girdner, the Social Security Administration's assistant associate commissioner for international operations.

Supporters say the proposal would improve the daily lives of Mexican citizens, many of whom are still trapped in poverty a decade after the North American Free Trade Agreement promised prosperity to the nation's 103.4 million people.

"Let's be honest, there are millions of Mexican immigrants contributing to the Social Security system and the U.S. economy," Katherine Culliton, an attorney with the Washington, D.C., office of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, told Gannett. "It's only fair they get back a benefit they deserve that will keep them from dying in poverty."

Critics, as well as some on the Bush administration economic team, worry that adding more beneficiaries would burden an already ailing system, just as American baby boomers begin to retire.

Currently, around 94,000 beneficiaries living abroad have been brought into the U.S. system under the auspices of about 20 international treaties designed to help Americans sent abroad by their employers signed since 1977. The accords are mostly with European countries, but also include Canada and South Korea.

Of the $408 billion distributed in Social Security benefits in 2001, according to Gannett, the federal government paid $173 million to about 89,000 foreigners living abroad.

Opponents contend the number of Mexican beneficiaries added to the fold would dwarf the total numbers from the 20 other countries. One estimate puts the number of Mexicans coming into the system at around 164,000 in the first five years.

Social Security Administration officials estimate about 50,000 Mexicans would collect $78 million in the first year of a U.S.-Mexican agreement. By 2050, the number is predicted to swell to 300,000 Mexicans collecting $650 million in benefits a year.

But that number doesn't include the potentially eligible, undocumented Mexican immigrants – numbering about 5 million, according to federal estimates – a recent General Accounting Office report pointed out.

Accounting for illegals, the agreement could cost U.S. taxpayers $750 million within five years of implementation.

Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, says if Mexicans receive the $8,100 in benefits that Mexican-born retirees in the U.S. currently get, the total expenditure for the program will easily surpass $1 billion annually.

Beyond the cost, Republican lawmakers worry the proposal will fuel further illegal immigration.

"Talk about an incentive for illegal immigration," Gannett quotes Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, as saying. "How many more would break the law to come to this country if promised U.S. government paychecks for life?"

Any "totalization" agreement ultimately reached must be approved by Congress.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; biggov; biggovernment; bush43; civilwartwo; culturewar; cw2; federalspending; handouts; illegalnotimmigrant; immigration; insane; legalplunder; mexicans; mexico; parasites; plunder; plunderamericans; proillegals; socialsecurity; spending; theft; thewelfarestate; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2003 3:48:27 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yonif
Please tell me this is just paranoia. If this country sinks (and it's sinking) there is nowhere left to run to.
2 posted on 12/11/2003 3:50:39 PM PST by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Well it's better than paying them Social Security to stay in the US.
3 posted on 12/11/2003 3:53:18 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
"Let's be honest, there are millions of Mexican immigrants contributing to the Social Security system and the U.S. economy," Katherine Culliton, an attorney with the Washington, D.C., office of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, told Gannett. "It's only fair they get back a benefit they deserve that will keep them from dying in poverty."

She fails to mention the cost to the States of illegals, which by far exceeds the benefits.

4 posted on 12/11/2003 3:55:51 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
" . . . the idea to merge both countries' Social Security systems was pushed late last year by Mexican President Vincente Fox as payback from President George W. Bush for failing to secure major new immigration reforms beneficial to Mexico City.

Payback, my eye! Just what in the Sam heck to we owe El Presidente Fox? Those who contribute to SS and are hear legally may deserve access to a Totalization Agreement (Finland, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Greece and a number of countries have such treaties in place already.) Those that are here illegally deserve nada.

If anything is to be paid to illegals, it should only be after the costs they imposed on U.S. taxpayers (higher unemployment, depressed wages, ER fees, crime, etc.) are deducted. They they would owe us.

5 posted on 12/11/2003 3:57:16 PM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
" . . . the idea to merge both countries' Social Security systems was pushed late last year by Mexican President Vincente Fox as payback from President George W. Bush for failing to secure major new immigration reforms beneficial to Mexico City.

Payback, my eye! Just what in the Sam heck to we owe El Presidente Fox? Those who contribute to SS and are hear legally may deserve access to a Totalization Agreement (Finland, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Greece and a number of countries have such treaties in place already.) Those that are here illegally deserve nada.

If anything is to be paid to illegals, it should only be after the costs they imposed on U.S. taxpayers (higher unemployment, depressed wages, ER fees, crime, etc.) are deducted. They they would owe us.

6 posted on 12/11/2003 3:57:26 PM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yonif
"But that number doesn't include the potentially eligible, undocumented Mexican immigrants – numbering about 5 million, according to federal estimates – a recent General Accounting Office report pointed out."

If you're here illegally you should be entitled to
NOTHING!

NOTHING!

NOTHING!


7 posted on 12/11/2003 3:58:20 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
If this happens I think we ought to look real hard at finding some cash-only jobs. I may just come down with a bad case of John Galt.
8 posted on 12/11/2003 4:00:09 PM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly; HiJinx; janetgreen; FITZ; gubamyster; SandRat; WRhine; joesnuffy; B4Ranch; moehoward; ...
PING.
9 posted on 12/11/2003 4:00:42 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Welcome to the 'New World Order'.
10 posted on 12/11/2003 4:01:32 PM PST by CMClay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Let's be honest, there are millions of Mexican immigrants contributing to the Social Security system and the U.S. economy," Katherine Culliton, an attorney with the Washington, D.C., office of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, told Gannett. "It's only fair they get back a benefit they deserve that will keep them from dying in poverty

Yes, let's be honest. The question is not how much they contribute but how much they drain. They came here illegally knowing full well that they were breaking the law and were not entitled to benefits. Obviously, they thought they were still getting a good deal. Why should we be required to sweeten it? I'm sick of a bunch of illegal leeches and their supporters and leaders preaching to me about what is fair while I support them.

11 posted on 12/11/2003 4:04:27 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
Please tell me this is just paranoia.

George Bush is officially just as bad as Gray Davis.

12 posted on 12/11/2003 4:04:36 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Well it's better than paying them Social Security to stay in the US.

How about the option of not paying them Social security and not letting them stay in the US?

13 posted on 12/11/2003 4:05:32 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
I guess Bush really wants to be a "One Termer".
14 posted on 12/11/2003 4:05:33 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
Well, that would be my preference too, however given the Compassionate Conservative nature of this WH it might be the best we can hope for - at least the WH wants them gone, whereas in 2001 they were going for a big juicy Amnesty.
15 posted on 12/11/2003 4:09:22 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
What do you think about them frijolas!
16 posted on 12/11/2003 4:09:29 PM PST by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
Oh no, don't say that! You'll be called a bigot xenophobe!
17 posted on 12/11/2003 4:10:00 PM PST by Guillermo (It's tough being a Miami Dolphins fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
Bush seems to be more interested in helping Mexicans and throwing away the first amendment rights of American born citizens. As amazing as it would seem, he's going to have a hard time beating Dean.
18 posted on 12/11/2003 4:10:20 PM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yonif
BUSH:ONE TERM PRESIDENT
19 posted on 12/11/2003 4:13:46 PM PST by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Yep. GW has pushed the envelope over to the point of no recovery. People hear say that we react to supposed trial ballons etc. Are these ballons being sent out by the administration? If not GW would/could/must/ come out & explain. Since he is not we can only assume it was at his discretion. Thus I see many conservatives not giving him their vote next Nov. Too bad. He had a chance to solidify a hugh group but blew it on his idiotic domestic policy.
20 posted on 12/11/2003 4:15:11 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson